FredLynn

Looking back at what you wrote: Assuming reasonable health (which did not happen for the Sox rotation with the lose of dice for the whole season, Bucknoltz for part of the season, Lackey's decline to surgery and the conditioning issues) your first four should get more work than your 5, its the "assuming reasonable health" part that I disagree with. I don't think you can make assumptions about the health of any player. Thats why teams are 7 or 8 SP deep to begin the season, and thats why, in reality, the inferior pitchers on teams may get more innings and starts than the better ones. Of course, in an ideal world, you would see the innings and starts decline as you go from #1 to #5. Practically speaking, it doesn't work out that way very often, if ever.

Sorry, but with all due respect Jung, this is nonsense. There are simply too many factors for your statement to be true, that a #4 SP will get more innings than a #5, injuries being a major factor. Here is an analysis of the Sox, Yankees, and Rays SP with their number of innings pitched and ERA followed by games started: Sox: Lackey: 160/6.41/28 Lester: 191/3.47/31 Beckett: 193/2.89/30 Wakefield: 154/5.12/23 (no one else had more than 14 starts) Yankees: CC: 237/3.00/33 Garcia: 146/3.62/25 Colon: 164/4.00/26 Nova: 165/3.70/27 Burnett: 190/5.15/32 Rays: Niemann: 135/4.06/23 Davis: 184/4.45/29 Shields: 249/2.82/33 Hellickson: 189/2.95/29 Price: 224/3.49/34 If your #5 SP is your fifth best pitcher (and I use ERA to measure that-if you want to use another statistic go ahead and do the analysis with that stat), then our worst pitcher was Lackey, for the Yankees it was Burnett, and for the Rays it was Davis. In EACH CASE the #5 SP pitched more innings than one of the higher ranked pitchers on the team. I suspect that if you analyze most teams this will be the case. In addition, the statistical #5 SP in EACH CASE had more starts than a higher ranked SP. Burnett had more starts for the Yankees than anyone but Sabathia. What you have stated is simply not true.

Not sure I really understand that reasoning. Assuming a rotation is five men deep then the fifth SP will get 99.9% of the starts the fourth SP gets. In any event, I was referring more to the quality aspect. I don't think this is the year to be bringing in a pitcher of high quality, even a #4 SP, because its a REBUILDING year. Its a year to wait until some of the many blunders our former GM come off the books. For example, Matsusaka will be off the books after next season. That is the time to look for real quality in SP.

I don't see the Red Sox signing anyone of Beuhrle's caliber and cost this year. There is simply too much money already allocated to SP right now. Cherington has intimated as much. Not to mention that his career BAA/OPSa vs the NYY are .333/.871 respectively. Furthermore, the list of potential FA pitchers for the 2013 season includes Cain, Greinke, Hamels, and Shields among others. I would wait until that year to sign another top tier SP.

Apparently Martinez is not going to be considered because he is felt not to have enough experience: Bradford from the Herald explains why neither Tim Wallach or Dave Martinez will get an interview for the Sox mgr job.... Tim Wallach won’t be next up in Red Sox manager search MILWAUKEE — Speculation regarding potential names on the Red Sox list of candidates for the team’s vacant manager position was rekindled Wednesday night when Sox president Larry Lucchino and general manager Ben Cherington both said the organization was most likely going to expand its pool of interviewees. Despite the likelihood that the team will meet with a new candidate, two names that still won’t be part of the process are Tim Wallach and Dave Martinez. Wallach, who was once considered a leading candidate to be interviewed by the Red Sox for their search, has not been eligible to be included in the team’s interviewing process due to a clause in his contract with the Dodgers. The 54-year-old, who has been serving as the Dodgers’ third base coach, has a stipulation in his current contract that states teams have a brief window after the season’s completion to ask for permission to interview Wallach for a managing job. The Red Sox did not ask for permission to talk to the former major league hitting coach and Triple-A manager prior to the expiration of that window. Martinez, the Tampa Bay bench coach, fell out of consideration during the due diligence phase of the process, as he was simply viewed (by both the Sox and Cubs) as not being a strong enough candidate to justify an interview. Early on in the process, the 47-year-old’s name had been included in most conversations regarding who might be brought in for interviews by thosee teams. Multiple reports stated late Wednesday night that Dale Sveum, a finalist for the Red Sox’ manager job, had been offered the Cubs’ managerial position. FoxSports.com reported that the Red Sox had not made Sveum an offer at the time of Chicago’s offer.

I read that somewhere: that Aceves has been told to report to camp ready to be a SP next year. Cannot cite a link, but it makes sense. He wants to start. Can he really be worse than who we have now as a #4?

Not a problem. I will make it a point to drink enough for both of us.

For the first five months of this season Bard was a superior pitcher to Papelbon. I posted those stats on this forum earlier. He deserves a chance to close games. Maybe it won't work out for him, but he certainly deserves a chance. I think he will do fine. When he has his FB and slider both working he is much more dominant than Papelbon. As for Paps signing with Philly, good luck to him. There is no way I think the Sox should have matched the offer he received, even if they were given a chance to do so. In fact, unless the Sox can steal someone, I don't think this is the time for ANY long term deals. Its a rebuilding year; time to clean house and wipe out some of the money already on the books in hopes of competing in 2013 or the year after that.

Don't count on him being "fit and healthy". Back problems tend to be recurrent. Once your back acts up once that chances if it happening again are much higher than someone with no history of back problems.

He might be the smartest guy around, but will he be forceful enough to stand up to Cherington and Lucchino-and the players-if he thinks he is right? I have no idea what his baseball IQ is; hopefully its much higher than mine. It should be, just as my "pediatrician IQ" should be much higher than his. He gets a shot at it. I am reserving judgement for now and joking a bit about it. Lets see how it plays out.

I think we have to give him a chance before passing judgement on him. Lets see if he is able to utilize the full offensive arsenal at his disposal (eg: steals, sacrifice bunts, hit and run etc), shows ingenuity, and is tough in the clubhouse. I am pretty suspicious that he is another yes-man, but Sveum deserves a chance. He will make mistakes, but hopefully it will be mistakes born out of aggressiveness trying to win games. If he fails in these regards then yes, there WILL be bitching.:harhar:

Everyone has the same sentiment, but he is going to be in the back of everyone's mind. If he did pitch injured for most of this year I am sure it affected his performance. So part of the blame has to put on the management for allowing him to go on and on and on being the worst SP in MLB with over 100 IP. They should have removed him once it became clear that he wasn't going to improve. Since he was THE WORST SP in baseball, by definition ANYONE would have been an improvement.

The season is young. My negativity is still in its offseason. Here is the link to the forum I was referring to: http://stfunited.com/ You might find it amusing. Totally vanilla; and totally uninteresting. Everyone waving the pompoms and wearing pink bonnets.

Believe it or not, there actually IS a forum for folks who do not like any negativity whatsoever. Complaining is not tolerated there; all is copacetic. Its totally vanilla. Not for me, for sure, but maybe VA SOXFAN would like it.

Sometimes, yeah. Other times I will suggest some concrete solutions that can be tried. I am sorry that you cannot tolerate any level of "bitching" at all. Thats just the way forums are. If you want a forum without any of that, pm me and I will suggest one.

Lets just call it "the acceptance of mediocrity".