Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

cp176

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by cp176

  1. I do think that it is just a matter of personal preference and the way you approach things. I learned over the years to be very careful with how I worded things. I think that Farrell would be better off in the long run if he said less and made fewer statements that seem like promises. Calling Kelly and telling him not to worry about being traded. Telling Swihart before spring training starts that he is going to be your opening day starter. These sound like good things but sometimes words come back to haunt a person to easily. Even though Swihart starting might seem obvious, you really never know and my feeling is the less said the better. I think that you are right about Dombrowski. I hope you are. In addition, I would add that if when Vasquez is ready, he will be our number one catcher. If the plan is to keep Swihart, it only makes sense to get him working in an additional position. I don't see him as a backup catcher at all.
  2. I've brought him up once or twice.
  3. I like John Farrell but he does make me uneasy. Most of us would have bet that Swihart would be our opening day catcher but to make that statement right now before camp starts seems too early. There is nothing wrong with players competing for spots. No one really knows what kind of physical shape Vasquez will be in come the latter part of February. Come to think of it, a healthy Hannigan isn't the worst thing that could happen. Farrell has a history of doing things like this as well as his tendency to hang on to players long after it becomes apparent that they can no longer get the job done. it is good news for Swihart but I think it could have waited another month or so. Maybe just to have him think that he needs to earn the job.
  4. I too am concerned over what we might get out of outfielders initially this year. They still represent a big ? mark to me but going forward I am not at all concerned. I believe that Andrew Benintendi is going to be a long time fixture in our outfield or someone elses. A potential all-star. I also know all about the pitfalls of moving players to quickly through the system but we have 2 big exceptions in Moncada and Benintendi. Huge years with respect to both Castillo and JBJ. They will be hearing footsteps soon if they don't get it going early.
  5. And that is the way it is supposed to be. If those two guys up top had a little speed, all the better. if they had good bat control and could hit behind runners even better.
  6. I don't have the facts but I bet he hit somewhere close to where Ted, Carl, and Jim Ed hit in their primes.
  7. You're absolutely right which means that in most situations with respect to good teams saying that a player slots into a specific place in a batting order really gets dictated by what a team needs. If 10 people are asked what makes a team's best hitter, I would guess that you are going to get a few different answers.
  8. Just a question - How about if your best hitter also is your best power hitter as well as your best run producer?
  9. First of all let me set the record straight for you. I am full of BS and not afraid to admit it. I value all of the opinions that are clearly stated that I read here. Some I value more than others. Your statements and opinions seem quite definitive and I am just not that way. Even if I do not agree with some of what you say, I do not consider what you say to be bullhshit. I think that it takes all types of opinions in order to come up with an educated approach to anything. I tend to get a little nervous when people lean heavily in one direction or another. Doesn't mean that I consider what they say BS. No one individual has all of the answers any more than one"s opinion normally is either right or wrong.
  10. Everything that is being written leans toward it not being Moncada who ultimately replaces Pedroia. If they keep them both, they will ultimately want both Moncada and Benintendi out there. Benintendi will be in the outfield. Moving Betts back to second might not look bad at all if our young guys develop the way we hope they will. If someone else comes along and can replace Pedroia both in the field as well as at the plate, then of course you would want to keep Betts in the outfield. It is going to come down to using what you have as well as you can to put the best lineup that you can put out there on a daily basis. Moncada and Benintendi I'm betting will play their ways into our lineup sooner than people think they will.
  11. I think that Pedroia's health could be a very real issue for us this year and beyond. I'm trying not to just give him a pass because I like him and am sincerely pulling for him. That is probably one of the reasons why I am not sold on the idea of Betts being a full time outfielder. Other than Holt or possibly Marrero I guess, I don't see a clear long term backup plan for him if he goes down. i think that Sandoval and Ramirez get covered easier than Pedroia does. Moncada could be ready to help as soon as the late stages of this year but not as a second baseman. Benintendi - who knows- he has been one of the best if not the best player at every level he has played at. He will be in our outfield (I hope not someone else's) sooner than people think. I might be giving DD too much credit but I think that he has a pretty clear understanding of how things work and that he won't hesitate to make moves that people might not necessarily agree with if they are in what he thinks are the best interest of his team. In the mean time, heres hoping for Pedroia's good health.
  12. In many instances, people create their own luck. In the case of the Red Sox signings - If you count on major contributions from people that have proven track records of being injured, you can't be surprised when one of them goes down again. You have to expect it and be prepared to deal with it. I would consider it very good and unexpected good luck if all of a sudden a player of this nature plays and stays healthy.
  13. I might not have been talking about you. In my world, I get to determine what is and what is not BS. Once again, not all of my comments and observations are directed at you and your views.
  14. this is a common sense approach and totally unacceptable
  15. I think that what you are saying here is why I like DD.
  16. I thought that I was a fairly bright guy but now I realize that I am just stupid. I would think that if your first two hitters were good it could possibly make the role of the number 3 hitter fairly important. To me that is common sense. All that being said, numerous high school teams experimented with placing their best hitter at the top of the order in the late 80's and 90's. It is not such a new concept.
  17. Oh boy oh boy- with just a little chuckle I am out of here for the night.
  18. You're killing me here once again. Right down the goddam drain I go.
  19. Absolute truth!!! There are some very bright people here but probably one of the reasons I do like DD is that he will not suffer from the classic "paralysis via analysis" that seems to be the theme of the day.
  20. thanks for noticing that one. I was thinking that my attempt had gone all for naught.
  21. Or it could be that I was just being a tad facetious. You want some clarity from me I will say this - You obviously have some inside scoop on Sandoval that I don't have access to you. 2 a day workouts and great cars plus a desire to be better this year is what I have heard. If he in fact has been doing 2 a days and gaining weight, then he is not the only one to blame. i know something about fitness. Before I got to critical, I would have to know what his workouts looked like. Just sos you know - My comment about Porcello was meant to be a joke. I just post here and read the board for something to do. I have yet to see a poster who has stunned me with their brilliance. I have been baffled by the ******** though.
  22. Money has not been an issue for this team's ownership and won't be going forward. We needed a third baseman. Had to overpay to get him which is what we did. we had no idea he would turn into a turd baseman. Even the Porcello deal was a gross overpay. Now if you wait just a couple more years when every back of the rotation guy is grossly overpaid, even his contract will look sensible.
  23. It's all about they guys - usually us older ones - we just can't get it figured out. Just kidding. The torment and torture has been equally shared regardless of age or sex. Is what it is. We are just stubborn folk trying to fight through a New England winter.
  24. hat brim to straight
  25. Some might seem to give him a bad rap but not many. I think that the majority of people posting here are just confused and concerned that these "rumors" have chased him around from team to team. You think everyone is just out to get him? Many of the most negative comments seem to me to be directed toward the obvious fact that he had a really bad year last year. If he cannot play a decent first base, could be a rough time for just a little while. No real doubt in my mind that DD will allow any potential problems to fester. For his future as well as ours, I hope that he can get the job done.
×
×
  • Create New...