OK well, obviously we're just going to disagree on this. The score at the time was 7-4 for us. My general attitude is that when you have a lead in the late innings your priority becomes preventing runs. So you keep the better defender in the game. That's all. Farrell can be questioned for the decision, but he did have reasons for it.
Yes, it's been established that Fenway is much more a doubles park than a home run park. A right-handed power hitter whose home runs tend to be of the high fly ball variety will have fun with the wall, of course.
We have a poster here, Dojji, who maintains, rather vociferously, that the whole 'relief ace' thing is a bunch of hogwash, that you need 3 top-notch relievers, period, and without that you're screwed no matter what methodology you use.
I don't disagree. We've been discussing this issue for a while, of course, and Tito earned great praise for the way he deployed Andrew Miller last year. But Tito did also have a highly effective Cody Allen 'backing up' Miller, too.
If you were treating every game like a must-win game, and forgetting about tomorrow, you would be using your closer to get the last 6 outs, not just the last 4 outs, every time you had a lead after 7 innings. Obviously that wouldn't work very well over the course of the season.
Most managers don't like to use the closer for more than 3 outs very often-game logs will confirm that.