Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    18,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. Do.Not.Want. He's a less talented Carl Crawford.
  2. Dojji, why do you insist in turning clear subjects into silly arguments? Napoli was brought in to be primarily a 1B with the ability to catch. There's no way to spin it. End of story.
  3. Not happy the Red Sox did not make a play for Haren.
  4. Not very smart, are you?
  5. Also, who cares about batting average? Look at the guy's OBP and OPS, remove him from the rigors of catching and let him hit at Fenway.
  6. BSN why why why why why do you insist on the idea that the Sox would consider trading Lester if they're going to spend money going for it this year? It doesn't make ANY sense.
  7. This right here folks, is the definition of irony.
  8. Haha this sounds too good to be true, so it probably is.
  9. That would be an excellent deal for the Red Sox to make. Afterwards they could sign a starter and an OF. /offseason.
  10. Yeah but then you'd have to also trade considerable assets along with Myers. That defeats the whole purpose.
  11. If the Red Sox are really thinking of spending money with the goal of contending in 2013, why would they make the Lester-for-Myers trade? That makes absolutely no sense considering how thin the Red Sox rotation is.
  12. Correction: 1st in the AL (4.43) 2nd in MLB (AJ Ellis was the leader with a 4.44 P/PA ratio)
  13. Napoli tied with Adam Dunn last year for the MLB lead in Pitches per Plate Appearance.
  14. They wouldn't pitch around him because he hit 7th in Texas.
  15. There's a lot of assumption there, but it's not impossible.
  16. The hell's wrong with this thread?
  17. Why and odd duck? That's the prototypical "all-or-nothing" hitter profile. Think Adam Dunn, Jason Giambi, Carlos Pena, and that's the profile Curtis Granderson is trending to as he ages.
  18. 3/39? Touche from Cherington.
  19. 3/45 would be my guess.
  20. The truth is that no matter what they do for next year, as Lester goes, so goes the starting rotation.
  21. If it's true, then they're going for it. They need an OF with pop and at least two SP.
  22. Haren was reasonably effective given his back issues last year. He's also 32, which is still relatively young, not 35 or 36. This is a guy you can gamble on for one year. If at his worst he's going to post 2012 numbers, he'd still be a significant upgrade for the Red Sox rotation.
×
×
  • Create New...