Which part was "a crock"? I had said "Strike zones are defined by the rules. The umps job is to enforce if a ball is in or out of that zone- not to make up a zone."- in response to the statement that umps "establish" the strike zone.
When you said, "No umpire is making up his own strike zone. He's simply calling what he sees. ".... I'm pretty sure we are saying the same thing with those two comments. My question / premise is that if when he sees it, interprets it, calls it wrong (outside of what the rules say) why not use technology to get it right? It is hard- in fact mindblowing how good of a job most umps do most of the time... but when you can easily make a visible line to ensure it is right all the time- I'm all for it. To me it is not changing anything- just making it more true to the rules.
I hear what you are saying and understand your point of view. I appreciate the perspective and back-and-forth. And you are spot on in my mind in regards to the actual outcome of the game... Sox needed to play better.. much better. Anytime any team needs a call or two to go their way to win... they are not a good team.