Can I point out that the Pirates used a computer once to fill out their lineup and it said bat Tike Redman third. Computers can only do so much, the rest is the guys on the field, and to put Hanley in a situation he has never been in before, and figure it's easy, was a gross miscalculation. He's always had a knock against him: selfish, lazy, bad fielder, etc. We are seeing here that he isn't by all accounts putting effort into his fielding, he's afraid of the wall f***ing up his shoulder, and he often has his head up his ass when the game calls for paying strict attention. It's unfortunate that his salary is so high to make a trade unlikely, and the other (only other) alternative is have him at DH which means Papi sits. Or do we ride out a year of totally butchered LF defense and then, ensuring Papi's option doesn't vest, install Hanley at DH full time. If we must keep both we're probably best off with him at DH and Panda at 1B. But as has been pointed out, Panda doesn't really hit enough for a 3B/1B anyway.