Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Emmz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Emmz

  1. Eesh, I think I'm nicer to Yanks fans than I am to Sox fans.
  2. Just about every movie with Rodney Dangerfield, a handful of Jim Carey movies, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, The Naked Gun, Airplane, Kentucky Fried Movie. Would you like me to continue? lulz
  3. Totally different situation, the Red Sox must have seen something wrong with Bay's health, otherwise they would have kept him in all likelihood. Why do you think it took the Mets to give him a huge deal? There isn't anything wrong with Crawford, he just hadn't been performing until right about now.
  4. You know, I tell you I don't see this move happening.
  5. And this is the funniest comment ever made, good one sir. Great movie, buuuut I've seen lots of funnier movies.
  6. Decided not to see it because it looks like it's the same movie. Lol, I even heard Tyson sings again. I was like uhhhh, seriously....? Sequels are usually a joke. I knew when I saw the first one, they'd make a s***** sequel that was the exact same movie. What could they possibly do that would make it different? From everyone's comments, I was right, most of them were wrong, I call it a savings of about 10 bucks.
  7. More straw men, pretty soon you'll have an army bro. That is a textbook straw man, trying to repeat someone's argument with something that's easier to defeat (Basically, not what anyone said AT ALL) so you can pretend to be smart.
  8. I didn't even see this.
  9. Straw man logical fallacy ftw.
  10. Scutaro kills Fatassia.
  11. Like this.
  12. Yes, but then there's no need to compare their numbers.
  13. Yeah, maybe with Pedroia out he can have it, but I'm still not so sure he'll get it.
  14. So what if he's on a hot streak. We know everything about Crawford, and that's what kills your argument. He never walks, he's impatient, and he's playing above what you can reasonably expect.
  15. There's not really any need to change lineups whenever someone's having a hot streak. He's playing above his career averages, and his career averages ain't even enough to get Pedroia off the number two spot even if he's not hitting well. If managers changed their lineups for whenever someone was having a hot streak, you'd never get a consistent lineup.
  16. If you're not on, you're not creating runs, and for those who are hitting 1-2, you need to be on, so that your 3-4-5 guys (usually your best run producers) can send you home. I like Crawford, I'd like to see his OBP to get up, and for him to start racking up the hits again. However, Pedroia is on base at a much higher rate, which equals to more opportunities for runs, whether he's fast or not does not matter when the OBP differential is that significant.
  17. I think he did, I just don't think he understands advanced stats.
  18. So you're saying that because Carl Crawford is so much faster than Pedroia, that even though he's got a very noticeably lower OBP, he would be scoring more than Pedroia? Your stats don't really prove your case, for all we can see it just says the Sox aren't driving in Pedroia as much as they should be. It's not his fault in that case. I think you'll need something a little more solid than that to prove your case.
  19. You look for .gif files, then you use the same thing as you use for regular images.
×
×
  • Create New...