Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    87,232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    284

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. Hi-Ho Silva...
  2. You're welcome.
  3. Easy. My grandma got 2 hole in ones in her 70's.
  4. @michaelsilverman 2016 Bogaerts: In extra innings: 3-for-6 (.500) In hi-leverage: 21-for-47 (.447) In tie games: 24-for-68 (.353) With RISP: 23-for-61 (.377)
  5. Why would a robot struggle with a strike zone adjustment? I think it would be better than a human a judging zones for different sized players.
  6. Re: Billy Beane and UN? Shallow men believe in luck or in circumstance. Strong men believe in cause and effect.
  7. @peteabe Ortiz will be pinch hit only here in SF. Farrell said volume of base-running is a factor in trying to save his legs, maximize ABs. Don't let him retire from this non-athletic sport though!
  8. A great man is always willing to be little.
  9. Tyrannosaurus Rekt
  10. Hope you will laugh when the goal posts for that argument are moved again...
  11. It is one of the blessings of old friends that you can afford to be stupid with them.
  12. When the lights go down in the city and the sun sets on the bay...
  13. Your opinion is not wrong, it's just not compatible with my world view. #yesallrobotumps
  14. Young is a great example then...
  15. There are too many variables for a robot third base coach to always be correct in sending the runner. Not sure why you are so against a clear and less obtuse strike zone. To me, automation of any other part of the game is silly and not relevant.
  16. Buch's entire career then?
  17. Sure, but the 2009 draft appeared to be a complete bust. Pitchers also take a little time to develop, so the Sox wouldn't see the fruits of this draft until they're on the next GM. It was a high risk/high reward opportunity for the Pirates, but only one guy has provided much value so far. Also, I'm not saying it was a wrong or right choice. I was just trying to add to the conversation.
  18. Probably?!? Did you even click on the video?!?
  19. Make Roller Derby great again!
  20. http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/team/draft.jsp?c_id=pit&year=2009 http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/team/draft.jsp?c_id=pit&year=2010 http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/team/draft.jsp?c_id=pit&year=2011 When you look at the draft results, I'm not chomping at the bit to do what Pittsburgh did. Cole is fantastic, but Glasnow and Taillon are still unproven.
  21. http://triblive.com/sports/pirates/10594352-74/taillon-pirates-league Spud, the Pirates went crazy on pitching from 2009 - 2011. Would you be happy if the Sox had the same results?
  22. For every minute you are angry you lose sixty seconds of happiness.
  23. I'm not saying you were. I was just saying even if they were allocate more picks towards pitching, the recent track record leads me to believe that they'd probably struggle to develop those guys.
×
×
  • Create New...