Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    82,744
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    205

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. The problem is that when you only swing at 5% of the first pitches, the other team will no longer nibble on 0-0 and will just get an easy strike. You are better off swinging at a middle middle first pitch than just automatically going down 0-1.
  2. Devers swings at 14% of the first pitches (938 OPS). That's the approach I favor.
  3. Sure. Anyone who takes a middle middle pitch to go down 0-1 is an idiot. Betts only swings at 6.8% of first pitches. It's not good enough. Hanley at least swings 10% of the time. Hanley's issues are of another variety. I poke at Pedroia because he seems to be the worst offender on the team. He's less likely to swing on the first pitch than anyone else in the clubhouse.
  4. His OPS when going down 0-1 was 668 in 2017. I believe your stats are misleading as it only references if he makes contact on an 0-1 pitch. https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.fcgi?id=pedrodu01&year=2017&t=b You need to look at the "after 0-1" stats.
  5. Dojji, He only swung at 22 first pitches all year for a rate of 4.75%. Jose Altuve swung at 143 first pitches for a rate of 21.6%. I think Altuve has a better approach. Sox fans still incorrectly think Pedroia is their own Altuve, but Pedroia isn't a shell of what he was in 2011. That's history pal. Unless he fixes his approach, his career is toast.
  6. I agree. I think that's the biggest complaint I have with Pedroia's approach. I understand wanting to take the first pitch no matter what when you are seeing a guy for the first time. However, the second time through the order, they need to look for a pitch to swing at. If something is in the hit me zone, just let it rip.
  7. Sale Pom Porcello Wright Beeks But I think Price has a 50/50 chance of being healthy enough to have a spot in the rotation all year.
  8. There's only one real deal: The Ryan Lavarnway. All others are cheap imitations.
  9. That's not the exact quote tho.
  10. He was the 6th best 2b per WAR in 2016. That was his highest WAR since 2011. Seems like an outlier to me.
  11. In a juiced ball year, the Sox were 27th in HR. Yuck!
  12. This team walks a lot (10th), k's very little (4th lowest), has a high obp (11th), but can't SLG for s*** (26th).
  13. Yup, if Henry didn't like the direction the team headed, no more prospects would have been traded after the Kimbrel deal.
  14. He was 19th in WAR in 2017. Top 10 isn't really one of the league's best imo.
  15. Cozart is a good glove/noodle bat SS. Those guys are dime a dozen. He's going to be overpaid next year. Hard pass. Prior to last year, he was a 246AV, 289OBP, 385SLG guy who strikes out 3 times as much as he walks. Yuck!
  16. Those negative WAR stats would continue no doubt!
  17. I think they want a team that won't shrink the last few weeks of the season.
  18. I'm a "no" on Ausmus.
  19. For how many games tho?
  20. Right, if it was just Beni for Stanton, everyone would do it. The trade would be Beni plus ERod plus two more guys at least (Groome and Chavis?). Stanton is great, but JD is available for just cash.
  21. What's the trade? Why dump MLB talent for one guy when you can get a FA that would approximate his value?
  22. Money talks. If the Sox wanted to keep Lackey, he'd still be here. Same goes for Lester.
  23. Well, they need SOMETHING to write about. Fans are more of the put up or shut up mentality. Price pitching well in the playoffs overshadows the Eck controversy to most fans imo.
  24. Theo >>> Ben > Domb > Duke (As Sox GM only, for a career Dombo is way better than Ben)
  25. JD is 30. Why would he fall off a cliff at 31?
×
×
  • Create New...