Blatant admission of your trolling ways.
You're always complaining about people hating on you.
If you don't want to be hated on, i suggest keeping your nose out of other people's arguments.
You were the one calling me out with your inciting comment.
Instead of being a pussy i decided to face you head-on.
I could report you for helping incite though.
I'm going to ask this question with zero, and i mean zero amount of sarcasm or desire to attack you personally, but:
Are you retarded?
Again, i'm asking this question legitimately.
FAIL.
RBI, like BA is a support statistic.
You can use it to accentuate run production if it's not the basis of your argument.
I suggest you stop trying to water down this very interesting baseball discussion.
I think she meant taking into consideration cost-production.
Hanley's expensive in both prospects and money, so by that account, Hardy would in fact be the best option.
I don't agree with that argument, though.
Milwaukee is a bandbox, and every park-effect measuring statistic tells you that it's actually a better hitter's park than Fenway.
The point being about his batting average.
No, it's the ESL alert that happens when you try to side with Crunchy, because in the end, no one understands what the f*** he's saying and understands it differently, so calm down, old man.
This statement is false.
Both HR per game and park factor have Comerica labeled as an "average" offensive ballpark, while Safeco is ranked as the worst park for offense in the AL, couple that with the fact that Seattle has a better OF defense than Detroit, and the statement is just plain wrong.