Almost every team in baseball has contracts they would rather not have handed out, but they're adamant about the defense of said contract, i see nothing arrogant with defending past moves, specially when, even though some of them have been horrible, a number of them have also worked, but they're often, if not always, overlooked, and the meat of this argument will always be JD Drew. Just because you don't like what a player brings to the table doesn't mean it's a bad signing, and stating otherwise is the really arrogant stance.
That being said:
Theo's regime has been extremely irresponsible with their willingness to absorb contracts at the first sign of trouble. That needs to change because it puts a burden on the payroll.