Since when are people not allowed to discuss the positive attributes of middling prospects, or the downsides of top prospects?
See the problem here is that you guys continuously decide that when I am willing to defend a prospect, often for little more than the sake of a good argument, that I have some kind of man crush.
The homoerotic references just drive home that point and amount to a rhetorical oversell, a dishonest tactic designed to artificlally put the other guy on the defensive.
I don't think that it's a particular shock to anyone that Buchholz's big issue is fastball command. He has stuff for miles but if he's going to have one weakness, that's a heck of a bad place to have it. That was one of the reasons that unlike Lester, Buchholz couldn't bounce back easily when he struggled last year. "Pitching backwards" is fine with the bases empty, but not even Buchholz can live in the strikeout indefinitely with breaking stuff, and there will be days when the breaking pitch isn't there for him, and when that happens Buchholz is pretty much screwed, as he can't go to his heater to get out of a jam consistently, at least not yet. That's a problem.
That's one of the reasons I actually think that while Buchholz is the more objectively talented, Bowden may well have the better career. He's got a better balance of skills for succeeding in MLB, including far fewer questions about his primary offering.
Go ahead and quote that and say "lolwut" or some other one liner to reveal your ignurance and unwillingness to tackle my point headon, and by all means continue to impugn my sexuality, since that's pretty much the majority of what you guys do here.