This statement is incorrect. We acquired one starter and the rest of our pitching has been more than adequate, and had the talent to be more than adequate from the outset. Our depth is also pretty decent, especially if we get Morales back. The overreaction to the underperformance of our pitching staff last year during the offseason reached the point of comedy several times.
They got a pile of something. I wouldn't have been the one who wanted to pay Mark Buejrle to pitch in the AL East at 34, and I wouldn't have been the one who had to try to hitch my season to Josh Johnson. While it's true they didn't give up a ton, they got some question marks back, no doubt about it.
Nnnnnot really. We've had above average luck, which contrasts starkly with our horrific luck last year and maybe that makes it seem like a bigger contrast, but so far what I see is a pretty danged talented rotation starting to play up to their ability.
I mean, which of Buchholz, Lester, Dempster, Doubront and Lackey -- a rotation that includes 3 former Cy Young nominees and one more talented prospect just starting to come into his own, were bad bets to pitch to an ERA of under 4 this year?
We love to hate Lackey because of his injury-filled last few years, but he was reported healthy and the reports turn out to be well founded. Only Dempster was a good bet assuming normal health, and he's certainly pitched well in his career.
No one needed to call it 100% o the time. All they had to do is point out, accurately, that it was hardly unreasonable to expect it of either pitcher. Buchholz has been a revelation this year, granted. He's the only one that's even really exceeding reasonable expectations.