If you compare Verlander to Papelbon you lose me, Verlander is a lot better pitcher than Papelbon. First of all has a proven record as a starter, Papelbon hasn't, Verlander's fastball is 95-96 which he can maintain deep into games touching 97-98, Papelbon can throw 95 for an inning, as a starter he was 91-93. While Papelbon has a good splitter (can't call it great) Verlander has better breaking pitches. If your point is Papelbon is as good as Verlander your point isn't objective.
One more point you keep saying that Papelbon has evindence of sucess. As what as a closer? as a stater? If is as a starter, it wasn't in the ML. he had sucess in Sarasota and Portland, but even at those levels Verlander was better. You keep saying he is a #2, where is the proof that he is a #2 is he better than Schillings or Beckett? of course not, I won't be at all surprised to see Papelbon be the #5 starter in the Sox rotation in 2007.