E1, good to see you. Stick around if you have some time. You make good points, and when I have some time tonight, I will put together a more thoughtful response. Keep in mind that young pitchers and prospects are just as likely to go down with an injury or underperform-- maybe even more likely. Of course the financila investment in them would be small compared to Lester. The one difference is that while Lester remains healthy, you know that you will be getting ace-like performance for a few more years. Prospects are just crap-shoots. I think the Sox have to start filling in the rotation with some young arms, but I also think they need one or two guys to build around. Lackey even with an extension should be fairly cost-controlled. Lester would be a big invesstment, but I think they could have raised the AAV and shortened the term to a reasonable 4 or 5 years. Reports are that they have made nothing beyond one nonserious offer. I think it is a mistake. TTYL.