Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. Looking at the hit tracker for 2010, he would have hit 22 HRs at Citifield. Not exactly "light tower power."
  2. Here was your question: It was a bit snarky ...no? The Sox have played Philly and I watch every Sox game, so I have seen him play. I've watched other Philly games too. I answered your question and you reply with name-calling?
  3. Yes, in fact, I have been to Citizens Field in Philly. Have you?
  4. That has been my concern since the season ended-- that FO would settle into the belief that the 2010 team was good enough if it didn't have injuries. It might have been, but there were other issues that needed addressing, and certainly if you subtract Beltre and VMart without making some big moves, the team is not going to be good enough. I think they are looking to make some big moves, but sometimes you need to close the deal. If they don't, someone else will. The FA talent pool is limited this year, so the prices will be up. They need to act.
  5. Jose Reyes was discussed a bit yesterday. Getting him would be huge. We could slide Scutaro to 3B. I'm not big on the first base options. I just don't see Konerko leaving Chicago, and I don't like Lee or Pena. I like Dunn, but not for a long term deal, and it would take a long term deal to get him. What about Overbay? He murders us.
  6. FYI. My definition of s*** season = no playoffs. No Werth, no Crawford, no Beltre = no playoffs. We might (I stress might) surpass Tampa because they will lose too many players, but the Yankees will blow us away, especially if they get Lee. If the Angels get Crawford, they will be resurrected. The only question will be how long we stay in the Wild Card hunt.
  7. I just checked the remaining FA list. If Werth and Crawford come off the board and we don't get one of them, we are looking at a s*** 2011 season. There also ain't a whole lot at first base and third base. Forget about catcher. What do people think about Miguel Tejada for 3B for one year?
  8. The stats that have been cited in this thread don't tell the whole story. There are other stats and facts to be considered. Crawford has been a very consistent player for much longer than Werth. In fact, he has almost twice as many career ABs as Werth and he is 3 years younger than Werth. In fact Werth has only had 3 seasons worth discussing. Until 2008, he was a part time 4th OFer type. Since 2008, he has been blending into the background on the best offensive team in the NL. They have Utley, Howard, Rollins, and Burrell (in 2008). In 2008, the all-time great, Pat Burrell had a better season. I am sure he is available at a much cheaper price than either Crawford or Werth. Werth's power stats have been inflated by playing on the best NL offensive team that plays in a bandbox. Managers do not go into a Philly series saying that they don't want to let Werth beat them. Managers in the AL know that the way to beat Tampa is to keep Crawford off the bases. That's the game plan, and it has been the game plan since Crawford has been in the league starting in 2002. At age 28 with twice as many career plate appearances as Werth, it can be argued that Crawford is just entering his prime. I'd much rather offer a 6 year contract to Crawford than a 4 year contract to Werth. In short, Crawford is a superstar with superstar skills. The choice isn't even close IMO. His speed and base stealing ability alone is a lethal weapon that few in the game possess. IMO if Crawford's agent doesn't get him 50% more than Werth, he is a quack. This debate really does remind me of the 1977 choice between Joe Rudi and Reggie Jackson (although Jackson and Crawford are very different types of players). One went on to the Hall of Fame and the other is largely forgotten. That's how I view Crawford and Werth ending up.
  9. Daily Reminder to the FO: Get Carl Crawford BTW: You also need a right handed corner IF with pop and a competent cacher. You have a lot of work to do. Get moving. We're bored to tears and we only have two-third of a starting lineup to discuss.
  10. It will be easier for all of us when the FO starts to implement its off season plan. I expect that something will happen in the next week before 2011 tickets go on sale.
  11. 1961-1970 Yaz was different than latter day Yaz. Late 60's Yaz was the best player in the game. He played in a pitching dominated era, and those who played with him who had also played in the NL like Ray Culp said that Yaz was as good as any of the NL stars of the 60's.
  12. I do engage in spying on the enemy. It's one of the advantages of being behind enemy lines.
  13. That's me. s***! I've been exposed.
  14. He worries me too. I hope that the Sox aren't making Werth a priority because we need a right handed bat. When it comes to superstars, lefty or righty doesn't matter. Crawford is a game changer. Werth is not. I don't know if any of you saw the ESPN mini-series The Bronx is Burning about the 1977 Yankees. There is a scene where Billy Martin is discussing with Gabe Paul the possible acquisition Reggie Jackson. Martin vigorously points out that they don't need Reggie, because they already have too many left handed hitters. He wants to get Joe Rudi because he is right handed and he's a better fielder. Paul tells Martin that Reggie is a star and Steinbrenner thinks NY should have stars. It worked out pretty good for the Yankees. Rudi became a 4th OFer type. Fast forward to 2010. Crawford is a star. Werth isn't. Get the star.
  15. Sometimes you need to pay through the nose.
  16. Theo fine-tuned the 2004 team as opposed to building it. The core of the team was put in place by Duquette, and had it not been for a bumbling idiot manager (who was not hired by Duquette), they should have won in 2003. In 2007, some key Duquette pieces were still around, and Theo was not responsible for acquiring the big key piece, Beckett. In fact, he was against it. All remnants of Duquette are now gone, and Beckett is now a Theo acquisition, since he gave him the contract extension. From here on out, no one other than Theo can take credit, and no one else will bear the responsibility.
  17. Okay. I'm going to say this once a day until he signs. Memo to Front Office: Sign Carl Crawford.
  18. Do you have an agreement that you can break the rules of this forum with impunity, because you break them all the time?
  19. What if the +1 is Kalish?
×
×
  • Create New...