a700hitter

Except his WHIP is around 2.

and Roy Oswalt sits at home with his bags packed and nowhere to go.

If Doji is calling the guy AAA Filler, he is garbage.

Throwing strikes seems to be a big challenge for Carpenter.

No McNutt:

The Boston media is a bunch of pricks. I have witnessed their handiwork for 45 years. There are some differences with the way they relate to this ownership group. Before this ownership, the media had more of the upper hand. The newspaper columnists were a small group, but a well established institution and they were kind of the only game in town. That dynamic has changed since the Sox have become a 24/7 media phenomenon. The press contingent is huge and they are competing with each other. Under past ownership, the press hammered players while they were with the Red Sox. For the most part, that has stopped. While a player is with the Sox, the press, for all intents and purposes, exercises a see no evil hear no evil approach, probably because they don't want to risk their access to players and management. After the players are gone, the press takes off the gloves. I think this is with the tacit approval of the FO which seems to be the most likely source of the leaks that are the basis for these stories.

In every single case the FO hands the media the matches. They are not coming up with these stories out of thin air.

i am glad you settled that issue with the bolded language.

Is that true? I hadn't heard that. That is more than a little petty.

I am not just referring to the stretch in the middle of his career. I am referring to all of his Cardinal years-- 1982-1996. He was well within the top half of Shortstops almost every season for batting related WAR. That's a long stretch, which makes it a long stretch to call him a below average offensive SS.

During his Cardinal years, his yearly WAR attributable to batting was well within the top half of Shortstops. Several seasons he was in the top few at his position, perennially trailing Ripken but few others.

They might as well wait until the Sox make the trip to Chicago in June for inter-league.

Case closed. Right?

It doesn't look like there is much hope for Jenks. It doesn't look like Cook or Ohlendorf will hit the ground running.

A SS with over 2,400 hits and almost 600 SBs is not an archetype for a "poor offensive player that plays transcendent defense." There were plenty of other slick fielding SS's with long careers that contributed far less offensively than Ozzie Smith, eg. Bud Harrelson, Mark Belanger, and Larry Bowa. Ozzie became a very effective offensive player. He was not a poor offensive player. He was the archetype slap hitter, but he did a lot of good things on the offensive side.

Feel free to go back and check my prognostications about these guys. When I saw Bard in Spring Training 2009, I reported that he was doing nothing but throw strikes and that he had seemed to tame his wildness. I also stated that i expected him to make it to Fenway that year. Ellsbury, I liked him from day 1. In his second AB that I watched, he hit a triple and it was pretty exciting. I was very high on his skill set.

My participation in the Iglesias discussion has consisted of me stating an opinion that Bobby V will give him every opportunity to win the job and that he will not have to hit much to win the job. He gave the Mets starting SS job to a light hitting slick fielding SS in Rey Ordonez. I was not taking the position that he wasn't ready. However, the justification by people supporting Iglesias to be the SS that he fields like Ozzie Smith is just stupid. It's not an obfuscation of any argument. I am not making any argument for or against the kid. It's a comment on a stupid justification for the kid's case, not a strawman. Saying that he fields like Ozzie Smith is like saying "he's Ozzie", because ozzie was known for his D, not his offense. I don't mind arguing with you about things, but if you are going to accuse me of using certain debating techniques, I'd like to know what I am arguing about. You have apparently placed me on one side of this argument without my participation on that side of the argument. Saying that people are being ridiculous for comparing him to Ozzie Smith is not a straw man, because I have not taken a position on the kid other than he will get his chance from Bobby V.

What argument am I making or refuting other than to say it is ridiculous to compare minor league kids to Ozzie Smith or Ted Williams. That's not a straw man. Do we have a chubby kid in the system? Maybe we could liken him to Babe Ruth. Edit: Seriously, I think if I posted that today is Monday, you would start your reply with: "that's always the way it is with you, a700":lol: