Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. I didn't say that. As between Doubront and Morales, I would give Doubront the decided edge. Edit: I think people underestimate the magnitude of suck in giving up 8 Homers in two games. I didn't check the NL, but not a single other pitcher gave up 4 bombs in a game twice. He managed to do this in only 9 starts, so I don't think it should be minimized as some sort of blip.
  2. Yes, it was a minor move compared to the others, but Minky was a very athletic first baseman.
  3. I disagree. Youkilis set records for error-less games, but I would not put him in a class with Minky, or Boomer, or Keith, or Mattingly. It's not just stats. Those other guys were spectacular and acrobatic for lack of a better term. You are free to disagree.
  4. True, and I am hoping that it was fatigue, but I suspect that the league was figuring him out. As for Morales, I had high hopes for him. He looked great until he faced the Yanks. Blowing up once could be considered a blip, but twice. 8 homers later and my confidence in him was pretty much gone. I'd still give the edge to Doubront. Either way, the loser of that competition would be a good depth option.
  5. He got traded this off season to the Mariners for Vargas.
  6. I agree that Boomer and Keith were spectacular with the glove, but I think you underestimate Minky's glove work. I don't know if you are going by your recollection or by stats. My recollection is that Minky was a special fielder.
  7. They wanted Offy to play 1B, because he was an atrocious second baseman.
  8. Minky was a special fielder-- one of the best that I have seen play the position. He was speculation. Kotchman was a good glove man, but not of the same ilk.
  9. I remember Kotchman as a zero for us.
  10. LaRoche is pretty good with the glove. Kotchman is not so much better as to justify the difference in offense.
  11. I don't believe in enabling prima Dona's.. We had him. He's a professional. He plays in the role assigned.
  12. Morales wasnt just bad against the Yankees, he was atrocious. He gave up 8 Homers in two abbreviated starts. On the other hand, Doubront had at least two brilliant outings versus the Yanks. That shows me that he doesn't shrink in big moments. Morales comes apart at the seams when he faces a potent offense.
  13. Hopefully, Napoli has another suitor and we can get a true first baseman that is healthy.
  14. It speaks volumes that Sands could not wrestle the Dodger job from Loney.
  15. A "fringe starter for us"? He was with us for 6 games before Theo inexplicably traded him for the punch-less Casey Kotchman. Since then LaRoche has been pretty productive except in 2011 which he missed most of with injury.
  16. If the guy has a bad hip, they should just walk away, not try to negotiate the price down or put contingencies in the contract. Big deal, if they get the injury contingency in the contract. If his hip keeps him from playing, they would be off the hook financially, but they'd have no first baseman/catcher. Big whoop. Move on and get a healthy body, not one held together with bubble gum and duct tape.
  17. The trade was a great move if we got no one in return. If either of the remaining 2 of the 5 bodies we received ever pitches an entire big league season, it will be icing on a very sweet cake. I would set the odds at 50/50 that either of them ever pitches a full season for the Sox as a starter.
  18. I like Berkman. He is a much better hitter than Napoli if he has anything left in his tank.
  19. I was pissed the first time around when after only a few games we traded LaRoche for the punchless Casey Kotchman. That still doesn't make sense to me.
  20. Yep, I think any organization would be thrilled with a 50% success ratio.
  21. I hope that you are right. The Dodgers have not been known to trade away there best pitching prospects. Probably the most notable exception to this was Pedro who they never believed would be durable enough to be a starter. Usually, the dodgers pump up their prospects reputations and unload them to other teams where they fail. Hopefully, this is another Pedro case. The dodgers are due for a screw up. It's been almost 20'years since Pedro.
  22. agreed, Morales would be a good depth option.
  23. Our system is not loaded with pitching talent. These guys are nothing special. Webster is slightly better as a prospect than Zach Stewart was. People tried to convince themselves that he was a possible back of the rotation starter for us before ended up in palooka- ville after the end of the season. I loved the LA trade, but people are over-estimating by a large margin what we got back.
  24. I am not criticizing the trade at all. As I said when it was just a rumor, I didn't care if we got anyone in return as long as they took the salaries. That was what it was all about. I think the Commisioner might have stepped in if it had not been a big market team like the Sox doing the selling. If it had been KC and not the Red Sox, it might have been a different outcome with the Commish.
  25. It was a trade that had to be made, and JH and LL had no interest in who came back. They just wanted the trade to go through. How people can look at that trade as building our system is a bit overly optimistic. We have already gotten rid of Loney, DeJesus, and Sands. The fact that the other two are top ten prospects for us speaks volumes for the lack of pitching talent in our system.
×
×
  • Create New...