Jump to content
Check out our top trade candidates list, now at 40 players and growing (almost) every day! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,329

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    I'll take the last word. Word.
  2. a700hitter
    Wright and Tazawa are also scheduled.
  3. a700hitter
    For those of you who care, I'll be posting here my observations from the games I attend this week. Rubby and Lester today. It should be interesting. Our lineup looks like a collection of garabage, but I am interested in watching Bradley. I'l be watching those 3 guys really closely. The rest of the lineup is bathroom break time.
  4. a700hitter
    Right back at ya
  5. a700hitter
    Is Porcello a guy tht you would like the Sox to get?
  6. a700hitter
  7. a700hitter
    Start a thread when Rolen signs with us. Otherwise, drop it. BTW, he ain't coming to Fenway.
  8. a700hitter
    I made no assertion about the situation, so how could I be wrong? I should admit being wrong about what in this situation? Be specific.
  9. a700hitter
    :harhar:
  10. a700hitter
    He sucks too.
  11. a700hitter
    E1 popped in ocassionally during the off season. He's been busy with wok and being a father. There really has been very little to discuss.
  12. a700hitter
    You are wrong you stupid loser. He never asserted that there was friction between Baker and Rolen. He simply said that he didn't think Baker wanted him back. The article does give the strong impression that Baker was willing to move forward without Rolen and with Frazier. Increase your meds so you can read better.
  13. a700hitter
    Here's the fact: Is it subject to interpretation? Sure, but the title certainly asked the right question.
  14. a700hitter
  15. a700hitter
    Buh Bye
  16. a700hitter
    He never said that there was tension. He just said that he didn't want him back.
  17. a700hitter
    No, stupid is stupid. I didn't see dishonesty on anyone's part. Opinion is opinion.
  18. a700hitter
    Here's what he said: BTW, it was Spitball that had referenced the problems with 2 other managers. SBF, never did. Can I get a GOTCHA from my fans!! Maybe from my biggest fan, Dutchy?
  19. a700hitter
    I don't think he said that.
  20. a700hitter
    How would you interpret the statement below from January 8th? http://fm100thefan.com/1760/no-word-from-rolen-yet-baker-ready-to-move-on/ This is a far cry from the verbal flowers Baker threw Rolen's way after he formally announced that he would not be returning. It's not made up either.
  21. a700hitter
    It's just a really stupid argument.
  22. a700hitter
    I thought the thread was about whether Rolen would be a good fit for our bench, but everyone is arguing over whether Dusty Baker wanted Rolen back? WTF!! Just ridiculous. It isn't germane to the thread. It's just another stupid game of attempted gotcha. If Fred had said that Rolen hated clam chowder, the same people would be arguing over that like it was a meaningful fact. BTW, I hear that he hates the stuff, can't stand the smell and doesn't like to be within 500 yards of it.
  23. a700hitter
    I didn't defend SBF. I said that it was a matter of opinion whether the Reds wanted Rolen back.
  24. a700hitter
    The tournament has no point. The World's best players are not there so who cares.
  25. a700hitter
    This from the guy who expects Cano to be a Dodger based on no evidence at all.
×
×
  • Create New...