One, I'm not quick to say anything. I don't think they are a more talented team without him, nor do I think they are more explosive offensively. I do, however, think there is some merit to the idea that they may play more consistent and cohesively as a team without him due to him taking plays off and his impact to team morale.
Yes, you did miss the point, because you compared games with/without him like it was an apples to apples comparison. Your point was basic, 0/2 good/bad without him, 3/1 good/bad with him. No consideration of the quality of opponent. No, #9 is not elite, but when his bad games all come against the 3 toughest pass defenses he faced, with or without Moss, the correlation I mentioned cannot be dismissed as cavalierly as you are doing it.