ORS
-
Posts
19,682 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by ORS
-
8/19 @ the Roy Halladays
ORS replied to Javier Lopez's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
The power of Drew's labia will put this game in the victory column. -
He also leads the league in bags of oats eaten.
-
Yep, don't want to block him with a scrub like Mark Teixeira.
-
Nothing on it, no wonder he doesn't want to throw strikes. I can see a Derek Turnbow situation on the horizon.........falling completely off the map of MLB relievers.
-
Is there any way Hill doesn't just blast one of the cookie machine right now? Not only does Papelbon blow this year, but the ship is sinking, and this king of chokers against the Yankees plays like Paul Bunyan against us.
-
Nope, the FO broke him.
-
I think she was trying to say that Drew has a vagina? That was my take on it.
-
Is it mandatory that Del-Bruney miss the zone by 5 parsecs with his first two pitches every outing?
-
Does that ball make it out of Drew's vagina?
-
What is that, the list of people with the biggest vaginas?
-
He has balls, they've just disappeared........ into his vagina.
-
-
-
It's a possibility. That said, I think it was clear then and it's clear now who the elite players were/are. The 1960-1980 field elites were just more consistent in the application of their talent. Thus, they won more, and they challenged the king more often.
-
It does. Also, Jack finished 2nd at majors 17 different times. A weaker field, like Woods' peers, and how many those are wins? How many of Woods' 14 are 2nd place finishes if he's facing a high caliber of competitors? I'm not suggesting I know the answer to these questions, but an objective look at it points to Jack facing tougher competition, and this shouldn't be ignored.
-
That's a poorly developed opinion. The elites just below Nicklaus during his era were better, in terms of success, relative to Woods' peers. Playing against a higher level of competition makes winning more difficult. Look at who's careers and peaks coincided with Jack's: Player (9 majors), Watson (8 majors), Palmer (7 majors), Trevino (6 majors), Ballesteros (5 majors), Floyd (4 majors). Woods has 4 guys with 3 (Els, Singh, Harrington, Mickelson), and only two of them look like they might win another.
-
That doesn't address the quality of the field of competition.
-
"May" not, again, whether you do or not is dictated by your competition. I agree with Crunchy's point for one reason. I've seen tons of people get paired with Tiger in the final group on the final day and fold like a lawn chair. Complete soiling of the britches by the turn. The elite guys just below Woods in terms of talent disappear when he's playing well. This didn't happen when Jack was playing. Is that Woods' fault? No, but I don't think it should be ignored when looking at career comparisons.
-
No, you can't play defense, but whether you need par or birdie determines how you approach a given hole. Whether you need par or birdie is dictated by your competition.
-
We know. Take away the specifics (age, issues, etc), and this is how you feel about every pitcher who will throw innings for the Yankees in 2010. It goes without saying.
-
Rough day for Tiger. Hard to hit quality shots with your hands around your throat.
-
Good point. Although, I'm pretty sure the TLev level is set with sarcasm, whereas the Dojji level is pure seriousness. I don't know whether to find that funny or sad.
-
-
Ryan Howard, Carlos Delgado (when healthy), Kendry Morales, Justin Morneau, Carlos Pena? Looks like the list is a little longer than you are saying. EDIT: Oh, and another "when healthy" guy, Lance Berkman.