Judging by the first sentence of this post, I'm forced to believe that you're misinterpreting my criticisms of Phil Hughes. I agree, he's very talented, and has the potential to be an ace for the Yankees (or any other team) down the line.
I'll reiterate what I've maintained all along about Phil Hughes, and you pick out what you disagree with.
He has a good fastball, which probably has good late life and movement. However, at this point, he has average control. Even if he's not missing outside of the strike zone, he's often wild in the strike zone, primarily in the upper regions of it. Hughes commanding his fastball better, down the road, is key to him reaching his potential.
He has good break on his curveball, although his command of the pitch is inconsistent. Once again, being able to throw this pitch for strikes, and bounce it when necessary, will help him down the road.
His cutter is average at best, as he has poor control with it, and it often gets hit hard.
His change is subpar, and the further development of this pitch may very well make or break Hughes' future as an ace.
Additionally, Hughes lacks a consistent put away pitch, which has really hurt him at times this year. Not only is it the reason for failures within individual at-bats, but it's also one of the primary reasons for his high pitch counts, making him a six inning pitcher.
This is exactly how I feel about Phil Hughes, and I've never strayed from these views. I've only voiced these criticisms because the above flaws have hurt the Yankees at times this year, and they're pertinent to the discussion about Hughes' future. Someone saying something negative about Phil Hughes doesn't mean they don't think he's any good. My feelings on Phil Hughes are exactly what I've voiced in this post, and numerous times throughout this thread.