TRANSLATION: For a 40 year old, Wells has better stuff than Schilling, therefore making him a "younger" 40 year old. Because Wells does have that good stuff, and because he's a valuable asset to the team (which he incorrectly stated that he had a team leading 15 wins in '05, because Wakefield had 16), he should not be traded away for "too little" in return. We can't get too little in return because we have big question marks in SS and CF, which causes panic. I think the front office is trying to make moves for its own sake to try and numb the sense that they aren't getting anything done. Whatever works...
That's what I believe he said. But yes, very confusing post.