YanksHater213
-
Posts
9,015 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by YanksHater213
-
-
I think mine is pretty f***ing sweet too.
-
-
BJGE is awesome. He looks so much better cause we're used to Maroney's dancing, but BJGE makes one move and pounds the hole. The guy is a pretty solid back.
-
He's a talented player, but the Pats are without a shadow of a doubt a better team without him. It was the best move for our team at the time. If we were to bring him back, it could be a good move simply because he's seen what the other side of the tunnel looks like. If he's a changed man and willing to accept a lesser role you can't not bring him back.
-
bump update your s*** guys
-
The most logical team for him to go to would be the Chiefs. Familiar QB, plenty of former teammates, give them a guy to stretch the field. It's fairly obvious he wants to come back here though. I don't really want him back but I would definitely accept him back.
-
Belichick made a bad deal and had no clue what he was doing, right? Each day that passes I look more and more right.
-
Tony Moeaki, TE
-
I don't block anyone. I have thick skin.
-
Bahahhahahahahahhahaha. Classic ignorance.
-
I really have nothing to say other than we have 3 wins and no losses against 3 good teams without Moss. The offense is looking much better. Morons will continue to say "WELKER ISNT HAVE 13 RECEPTIONS PER GAME". Well I say, who gives a f***? We're back to the 2001-2004 "who gives a f*** about stats" offense. We're a better team now without Moss, I firmly believe that. If you don't agree, well I'll be laughing all the way to the bank when we're winning games.
-
-
Well the Mossless Pats best a Moss-full (?) Vikings. I guess I was right, we f***ing for sure are better without Randy. You debate that and you absolutely do not know football, end of story.
-
Definitely risky, but I won't be counting on him to do much other than handle the ball for my second unit. I don't care about numbers really for this pick. He's a very good ball handler with the upside to be a great offensive player.
-
That doesn't matter at all though. It's not about how he does in the NBA but how he does as a basketball player. I could pick David Ortiz if I wanted to.
-
So for Ricky Rubio, since he doesn't have an NBA contract, I used the number of his buyout from his team in Spain which was $5,000,000. Didn't feel it was fair to not allocate a salary to him.
-
ahhhhh f*** you that was my TE
-
Not to ruin my draft strategy or anything, but kickers are kickers and punters are punters. Unless you pick a bad one, you're fine.
-
I think it should be 4 hrs right now. Skipping isn't as big of a deal now cause most people are drafting for positions as opposed to talent.
-
IMO there are 3 or 4 teams that are completely pulling away from everyone.
-
-
No, it's fine, I just interpreted the chart differently than the rules apparently said. I wanted to mainly go 3-4 regardless of anything, so if we keep it as is, I'm fine with it, and if I decide on a DT for my bench then that's what I do.
-
-
Okay, well that was what I wasn't sure of. That changes things for me, and lets just all go on the assumption that that is how it will be. So if I want the option of running a 3-4 or a 4-3 I will take a DT as a bench spot and not as a TE spot.