Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I understand that' date=' but after the argument you just got in, you can't really add a tone to your words on the internet. I read it as slightly antagonistic, even though I'm sure that's not how you meant it.[/quote']

 

Fair enough. I'll try and make my intent more clear when joking in the future.

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I have to admit it, my post was slightly antagonistic. If only because I felt that ORS' involvement in this thread was about two steps removed from trolling because he wasn't really showing any effort to add anything to the discussion but critcism and sarcasm.

 

It's not that often that CrespoBlows is less antagonistic and more helpful to an off the wall trade suggestion than someone else, but he had ORS beat pretty clean here. (for which I thank CB, BTW -- he's really done a great job of playing nice since the stronger enforcement).

 

Yeah, I need to get out of this conversation. I'm done.

Posted
I have to admit it, my post was slightly antagonistic. If only because I felt that ORS' involvement in this thread was about two steps removed from trolling.

 

It's not that often that CrespoBlows is less antagonistic and more helpful to an off the wall trade suggestion than someone else, but he had ORS beat pretty clean here.

 

... are you serious about the second part of this post? Are you trying to get him into this too? This isn't a concern you have to bring up right in the middle of the thread man.

 

I know it was slightly antagonistic, and I understand you were upset. I'm just giving you a second chance and telling you to drop it because I really don't want to be banning anyone right now for carrying out a stupid little feud. Please, after this post, I don't want to see anything regarding the issue anymore. It is dropped. Don't even quote my message and say "Okay. Dropped." I just want it dropped because the thread is being hijacked.

 

OKAY- Back to Wagner.

Posted

Not much to really say about Wagner until he pitches for us. I'm curious how Tito will use him. I think a limited, situational role would probably be best. He'd be useful turning around NYY's 4 switch hitters though, and make them pull the ball to left rather than letting them lift one into the flue draw in right. Switches tend to pull from both sides of the plate so not giviing them easy access to the right field wind tunnel is worth the effort.

 

He might be especially useful turning Teixeira around.

Posted
Not much to really say about Wagner until he pitches for us. I'm curious how Tito will use him. I think a limited' date=' situational role would probably be best. He'd be useful turning around NYY's 4 switch hitters though, and make them pull the ball to left rather than letting them lift one into the flue draw in right.[/quote']

 

With rosters expanding, I can't see him getting over used. 1 IP or less. Maybe a save chance on Papelbon's nights off.

Posted
That's a great point. Without us "original thinkers" this forum would be a much drier place. You can only get so far with a forum that exists as a Sabermetrics Symposium. That's a huge part of what's wrong with SoSH. They discard whole categories of thought in the quest for a "quality contribution" and as a result the whole forum sucks.

 

lol the only reason you think that way is because they banned you twice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...