Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

5GoldGlovesOF,75

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by 5GoldGlovesOF,75

  1. This is how bad it's gotten in Red Sox Nation. We are mulling the possibilities of starting a player in centerfield who has absolutely struggled in his big league career so far. He can't hit MLB pitching, can't catch MLB fly balls, and can't even make the right choices to always accompany his club to all MLB ballparks. But there are reasons Jarren Duran got drafted, progressed through the minor leagues and made the majors. Many professional evaluators -- including none of us -- approved of his promotions. As noted by others, many ballplayers are late bloomers (yes, pun intended, because even our favorite CBO reminds that not everything is linear... unless it's a line graph depicting the ups and downs of life in the fast lane). Surely make you lose your mind...
  2. Duran is 26. Roberto Clemente didn't hit .300 in the bigs until the season he turned 26 (his 6th as a regular in the majors). The other thing they had in common in those years is hitting at least as many triples as homers. That's all I got...
  3. Adam Duvall is an unsigned free agent all-or-nothing right-handed power hitter that makes too much sense as a replacement for Trevor Story in the batting order. In 2021, Duvall helped a first place team win a World Series. He blasted 38 homers, led the NL with 113 RBI, and played Gold Glove defense in the outfield. Couldn't a last place team use a guy like that?
  4. On the mlb.com prospects list, the Red Sox list 13 infielders in their top 20, including 8 shortstops. Many are the sought-after, versatile, multi-positional players valued so highly by this administration. Mayer and Rafaela have to be Boston's #1 and #2 prospects going into '23 (since Casas and Bello are now big leaguers). But there has to be one or two of the other 6 that at least one of the other 29 MLB clubs might want in a trade: Romero, Lugo, Paulino, Bonaci, Coffey, Koss. We don't need 8 future shortstops -- package one in a deal for a major leaguer to play there this year... and/or a centerfielder... and/or a second baseman. Let's go.
  5. Quick, sell him to Baltimore, where he can join Darwinzon and further boost our chances to climb out of the basement.
  6. If one of his pitches hits a batter...
  7. It's a great way to avoid spending on all the higher-priced players who are in actual demand... especially if you're hired to build the best possible team costing the least amount of resources.
  8. Over/under on '23 Casas: 20 HR, 80 RBI, 80 BB, 80 K, .250 BA, .800 OPS I'll take over on all...
  9. Neither has ever started even one-half a regulation MLB season in the infield. If Turner is primarily the DH, that leaves exactly two players on the Red Sox roster who have started half a season in a big league infield: Raffy and... Dalbec! Is you ready?
  10. This is actually not opinion: a month before Spring Training 2023, the Red Sox' infield is half-empty.
  11. Felger and Holley on NBC Sports Boston are killing Bloom this morning, for asking Red Sox Nation yesterday, "Now do you see our vision?" They were like -- for finally signing a homegrown player? Felger: "What vision? Right now your MLB team sucks. The Red Sox blow."
  12. Bloom, according to Tom Werner yesterday, is "one of the finer heads of baseball operations in baseball." Maybe someday it will come out that an owner or another sharp spear of influence recruited Story -- instead of Bloom (like in the Larry L days). Meanwhile, your first big money signing -- the guy you specifically added to replace your star homegrown shortstop -- can't replace him. Not one of the finer head's finer moments.
  13. When assessing the worth of some of these, especially pitchers, the rings are certainly a factor. But my point was about investing long and large on starters -- is it just bad luck or more bad management that the Red Sox' mound targets all seem to miss entire seasons in the rotation: Schilling, Lackey, Sale... not to mention paying Price to miss entire seasons in Boston. If it's not incompetence or a curse, I guess if someone analyzed other big money free agent pitchers, there would be similar results? Scherzer was an exception, but even he's had breakdowns or early exits in recent postseasons. Cole has been durable so far... (but not good enough when it counts for Yankee fans).
  14. Understood. So is the concept that you're only signing him for three -- instead of six -- albeit, prime years.
  15. It's impressive you compiled it. Yikes, how many were actually worth the entire investment? Certainly, Big Papi... Bogaerts for three years (but a reason to never again grant an opt-out clause)... JD, Porcello (won a Cy, leading winner on the greatest Sox team)... maybe Drew: 4-year average .853 OPS (his 5th year was half-a-season, but final seasons of contracts are accepted as lost causes).
  16. It's always reassuring for Red Sox fans on this Red Sox forum that -- even when things look grim -- we can always count on another empty diatribe by a bitter fan of their annually choking arch-rivals. Where would we be without our Optics Mystic?
  17. A quick list of Red Sox pitchers paid like top-of-the-rotation starters: Sale, Eovaldi, Price, Lackey, Beckett, Schilling, Pedro -- JFC, they all got hurt and missed considerable time on the IL. All had good to great runs, but none were really good investments for the life of his contract, except Pedro -- whose arm still required a two-week vacation every summer. In contrast, a lot of big money position players played or tried to play through their aches and pains: Bogaerts, JD, even Pedroia (whose jersey they had to rip away, just to get him off the diamond). Was Manny ever hurt? This excludes Story, who was clearly damaged goods no matter how hard he threw having a catch last month...
  18. Bloom spoke directly to the fans at today's Devers Forevers presser (I'm totally with you on Raffy, but can't give Chaim much credit for trading Diekman, when he's the guy who signed him in the first place; but, at least he dumped him in time to get something useful). When Bloom said the plan was to build around Raffy, and alluded to what the Sox have coming, I took that to mean farmhands and not mercenaries. But don't get me wrong, like anyone else I'd love Soto, and maybe mega talents are the best get-what-you-pay-for way to invest. We know spending large and long on pitching has to be the worst odds -- as far as getting entirely healthy returns on the life of their contracts. Maybe the best plan is to pay big for star position players while just keep acquiring established MLB starters over-30 with a lot of mileage but know-how -- 1-3 years at reasonable rates -- and go heavy on cheap young power arms recycled from the minors to eat up the bulk of relief innings... which comprise half of every game nowadays. It works in other places.
  19. You be clutching at semantics. And......... that clutch is measurable, notin (Red's 12-word post).
  20. And yet, the ones constantly typing the label sometimes read like the biggest ones of all. Fans want their team to win, so they can cheer. When they lose, they boo because they can't. When their team loses a lot -- or even a little, because of what looks like obvious flaws -- fans complain, because they wish it was better. All fans are experts on how to improve their team (some even post ideas daily on webs blown into clouds). However, very few fans aren't disappointed in the present, but secure in the knowledge that in the future, a plan might work... especially if it's supposed to be five years from now.
  21. Monarch might be the most appropriate if they're indeed endangered now (because humans are endangering everything).
  22. The glass is half-full in the bullpen, with a new old veteran closer and a set-up man who doesn't walk batters. If only we could count on the good Whitlock or Houck to be part of it... The glass is half-empty in the rotation, with two new old veteran starters, plus the Flying Stickman from the 20teens, along with Bello and Pivetta. If only we could count on Whitlock or Houck to be good parts of it... The line-up? The only known commodities on the field are Devers and Verdugo. Casas could be good, Kike could be healed, and Yoshida could be a big leaguer. There's weakness up the middle: catcher, where Chaim wants an upgrade; second and short, where there aren't nobodies -- but no bodies; even center, depending on whether Kike moves to the infield. Turner can still hit enough to DH, but the holes are dire... right now: half-empty. This thread isn't called A Pessimistic View of '23, but no one can feel confident today these Red Sox will win more than they lose.
  23. Calling Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard!
  24. I'd like to replace entitled with liable, please. It's a fan forum, after all.
×
×
  • Create New...