harmony
-
Posts
6,313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by harmony
-
So far this year? Seattle's Edwin Diaz (and others) https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0 Small samples.
-
At this point you're dodging the question (which may be answered the specific terms of the Red Sox contract with Hanley Ramirez ... or not).
-
Precisely.
-
Hanley Ramirez is on pace to meet the conditions. If he signs with another team in a week he could still meet the conditions. In November 2014 Ramirez agreed to play four seasons for the Red Sox (or their assignee). The designation for assignment may or may not prevent Ramirez from meeting that condition. Still, the Red Sox are on the hook for the balance of his 2019 salary of $22 million (less the prorated league minimum if he signs elsewhere). That Red Sox obligation did not disappear. My point is that Ramirez should be entitled to the bargained-for benefit of the vesting option if he reaches 1,050 plate appearances in 2017-18 and passes a physical. My question is what team should be responsible for the vested option.
-
If, as Evan Drellich reports, the "Union steadfastly protects value of contracts," how can the vesting option, a negotiated benefit of value, simply disappear? I suspect we haven't heard the last of this issue.
-
Not necessarily if no team will sign Hanley Ramirez to the league minimum this year because of fears the 2019 option will vest. In November 2014 Ramirez signed a contract that reportedly said a 2019 option for $22 million would vest with 1,050 plate appearances in 2017-18 (and a passed physical after the 2018 season). I doubt the vesting option simply disappears, especially when Ramirez was on pace to vest the option. Again, I don't know the terms of the Red Sox contract, which I hope addressed this contingency.
-
Except the Red Sox are still on the hook for the balance of this year's $22 million salary (less the prorated league minimum) even though Hanley Ramirez would be playing for another team under a new contract.
-
-
Well, Hanley Ramirez still gets his 2018 salary of $22 million.
-
I don't know the specifics of the Hanley Ramirez contract but I suspect Ramirez may have a grievance if the vesting option is voided. Ramirez was playing well enough to be on pace to vest the $22 million option for 2019. As the Alex Speier article mentions, it would have been awkward for the Red Sox to keep Ramirez but cut back his plate appearances to avoid the vesting option. However, any grievance Ramirez may have had with that strategy pales in comparison to a grievance that the DFA voids the option altogether if no team claims him. Again I don't know the specifics of the contract but I doubt Ramirez can lose the benefits of the vesting option that easily.
-
In the likely event Hanley Ramirez is not claimed, a team would need to decide whether Ramirez is worth the league minimum this year and $22 million next year to play for roughly one and two-thirds seasons (assuming the team plans to play Ramirez enough to reach the vesting option). That prorates to an annual salary of about $13.5 million. Ramirez may be stuck in purgatory ... at least until later in the season when a team can sign Ramirez for the league minimum and not worry about the vesting option.
-
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2018/05/25/red-sox-part-ways-with-hanley-ramirez/V8PHkHq10EEMLEATQKCeQK/story.html
-
And flush $30 million down the drain? Hanley Ramirez -- prorated 2018 salary of $22 million Jackie Bradley -- prorated 2018 salary of $6.1 million Sandy Leon -- prorated 2018 salary of $1.95 million Christian Vazquez --prorated 2018 salary of $1.425 million plus $13.55 million through 2021 Drew Pomeranz -- prorated 2018 salary of $8.5 million
-
I suspect the Red Sox will designate Blake Swihart for assignment and then within seven days trade the switch-hitting catcher to the highest bidder for a player or players who won't require spots on the 40-man roster or who at least have options left.
-
We'll leave that to you. The provided link explains the calculation that goes into the projection (which is a probability, not a prediction): https://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/ An aggregate projection (ZiPS, Steamer, Depth Charts combined) tends to be more accurate than an individual projection.
-
With the 80-day suspension of White Sox catcher Welington Castillo, the Red Sox could offer the out-of-options Blake Swihart and Brian Johnson for two veteran relievers: righty Joakim Soria and lefty Luis Avilan. Soria earns $9 million* with a $1 million buyout of a $10 million team option for 2019. Avilan earns $2.45 million this year and remains under team control through next season. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=4&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0 * the Kansas City sent $1 million to the White Sox in the trade of Soria in January
-
I stayed at a Fairfield Inn by Marriott in Dedham about a five-minute walk from the Franklin Line South Station. https://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/bosdh-fairfield-inn-boston-dedham/ The MBTA trip to Fenway Park requires a transfer at the Back Bay Station.
-
I understand that you are profanely upset, but ... :)
-
ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Charts project Blake Swihart with rest-of-season wRC+ of 58, 69 and 64: https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=13176&position=C https://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/
-
Does Jake Diekman share that characteristic with Blake Swihart and Brian Johnson?
-
Should Jackie Bradley Jr be traded?
harmony replied to StephenCurry30's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Just last weekend I was talking with a Buenos Aires native about Argentina's lack of interest in baseball. My sister-in-law's beau will skip my daughter's college commencement next month because the event conflicts with Argentina's opening match in World Cup soccer. -
Perhaps you're correct: https://nolanwritin.com/2018/05/17/texas-rangers-catcher-blake-swihart-boston/ ... or not.
-
To acquire the expiring contract of Texas lefty reliever Jake Diekman, what would the Red Sox need to add to an offer of six years of left-hander Brian Johnson and four arbitration seasons of Blake Swihart? https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5003&position=P https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/diekmja01.shtml Diekman will earn $2.7125 this year before becoming a free agent at the season's end.
-
Should Jackie Bradley Jr be traded?
harmony replied to StephenCurry30's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
This non-Catholic holds the current Pope in high regard but even the pontiff is not beyond reproach.😊😊😊 -
Blake Swihart won't land a high-ranking prospect. Swihart's trade value may have dropped below that of Jarrod Saltalamacchia in July 2010 when the Red Sox traded for the switch-hitting catcher. As I've written before: Blake Swihart is a year older now than Jarrod Saltalmacchia was in June 2010 when the Texas Rangers traded the switch-hitting catcher to the Red Sox for Chris McGuiness, Roman Mendez, Michael Thomas and cash. SoxProspects has never ranked the three prospects among the Top 20 in the organization. McGuiness and Thomas apparently are out of organized baseball while Mendez is a 27-year-old toiling at Double A. Saltalamacchia peaked at No. 18 on Baseball America's Top 100 prospect list while Swihart peaked at No. 17. At the time of the 2010 trade Saltalamacchia was back down at Triple A, much as Swihart had spent much of his age 25 season at Triple A after being a starter at the MLB level. With Saltalamacchia as his optimistic ceiling, Swihart has limited trade value.