I’d like to know what makes Gold Gloves ballots valid from a scientific standpoint. Or do you allow the criteria to waiver in favor of the methods you like better?
Also, shouldn’t it be “Joe Torre and Gold Gloves vs. UZR”? I think we can all agree, baseball forum input is the least reliable method of the three, but the preference for JT and GG over, say, me isn’t even close to a condemnation of the statistical analysis done for UZR (and DRS, which was in the article)...