The thing that gets me the most is how some people assume the team will continue doing (forever) what it has done over the most recent 2-3 weeks, however, once the team has done very well over the last 2-3 weeks, these same people want to now look at just the last 4-5 weeks not the last 2-3, not the last 365 days, not the last 3 years.
It's like they seek the worst possible sample size to use to project doom & gloom, and they never seem surprised when the projections come out wrong many times.
No way are we going to stay this hot (last 14 days), but our pitching was always better than the first 2-3 weeks showed.
I know the expression, "A pitcher is only as good as his last start" has some merit, but sometimes I think we take things to an extreme.