Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    107,364

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    It’s not Schwarber v Duran: it’s Schwarber v Arroyo or Dalbec. Basically, Dalbec vs Arroyo, and we could platoon them by moving Kike around.
  2. moonslav59
    Gotta love the .571 OBP. There are still posters who think Bloom did “nothing” at the deadline. Schwarber>>>> Rizzo
  3. moonslav59
    Peaking early. (BTW, Sale hit 98 a few times and 96 several times, last night. Seems to be proving you wrong, so far.)
  4. moonslav59
    I’ve already said I’d take both, and it might just be for 1 year, anyway. I’m worried about having enough cash to get better pitching.
  5. moonslav59
    I’m one of Dalbec’s biggest supporters, but we all know he yo-go’s, and Arroyo at 2B is as good on O and makes the defense better at 2B and CF. There are reasons. I’d like to see Dalbec platooned at 1B with Schwarber and Schwarber in the OF when Dalbec is at 1B.
  6. moonslav59
    Why can’t we ever find guys like him?
  7. moonslav59
    10 less RBIs than Bogey and 150 less PAs, too.
  8. moonslav59
    Bobby Dee not so quietly up to .740, now!
  9. moonslav59
    Devers sure finds ways to keep getting RBIs during slumps.
  10. moonslav59
    11 in the 6 games prior.
  11. moonslav59
    .817 from May 1st to August 14th.
  12. moonslav59
    It seems like JD has been on a steady decline since his red hot April, but watching a high OPS fall steadily can be deceiving. Until just the last week or two, he’s been remarkably consistent, and not too bad, really, except that we expect .900+ from him. 1.175 April .801 May .788 June .806 July .749 August (.563 last 2 weeks)
  13. moonslav59
    Pivetta
  14. moonslav59
    Vaz swings at too many balls out of the zone.
  15. moonslav59
    Chris Freakin’ Sale!
  16. moonslav59
    Great AB by Schwarb
  17. moonslav59
    He topped 98 at least twice but don’t tell Jacko. He has his own numbers.
  18. moonslav59
    who needs Charles Schwab at 1B?
  19. moonslav59
    Except when he cried “No mas.”
  20. moonslav59
    I have very little issue with the FG charts or their labels. Just don’t say Barnes is an average RPer, because that’s not what the charts say, nor the data. Say he’s an average or below average player- not average or below average RPer. No complaints from me.
  21. moonslav59
    So, it’s Duran Duran
  22. moonslav59
    Now, it’s .365 OBP and .451 SLG for a total of .816. Oh, the wonders of small sample sizes,
  23. moonslav59
    Calling Barnes a role player and occasional solid player by the FG charts is fine with me, but he’s not below average as a RPer.
  24. moonslav59
    My only concern in this discussion was determine whether Barnes was average, above or below. I’m fine with 3, 5, 6, 7 or however many categories to split them into. No doubt, he has been above average among RPers of his time. When you get into all time, it gets trickier. Do you go by quantity, quality, both. How short of quantity is allowed for a great stretch. Take Uehara: his numbers for a 3, 4 or 5 year stretch were better than Mo’s, but I wouldn’t place him above Mo, overall. If you asked me who was the best for any 4-5 consecutive years, I might say Komi. No way would Barnes even be in the discussion for top 50 of all time, but he’s in any above average category that brings the sample size down to his size. Out of 354 relief pitchers with 350+ IP since 1991, Barnes places 157 in fWAR, but it might be interesting to see where he places in WAR per 60 IP. He places 84th in FIP.
  25. moonslav59
    actually, it's 2(.6 x OBP) + 2(.4 x SLG) That would bring Ottavino from .642 to .652. Doesn't seem like enough. 2(.6 x .347) + 2 (.4 x .295)
×
×
  • Create New...