Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I loved the Sale extension and still do. Missing a year plus hurt, but I still love having him. I thought the Eovaldi signing was too much and too long, but almost all deals for meaningful players are high. Overall, I did not like the deal. The first 2 years of the 4 were nothing all that special. He’s earned his pay and then some, this year. To me, how he does in the post season and 2022 with tilt the balance one way or the other.
  2. The IL is not day to day, right?
  3. Of course it does, but I have never said he should be benched or play less. The CERA issues have not tilted the balance enough, to me. Now that he will be making $7M, my opinion has changed. Trading him makes sense.
  4. Now, you are catching on.
  5. He's been cheap, until 2022. He's hit better than 75% of catchers. He frames and throws well. He blocks pitches well. All this outweighs the other stuff. Same as Bogey at SS. You guys act like I've been saying he should be benched or DFA'd. I've never even said he should play less. Stawmen.
  6. What's wrong with Whitlock?
  7. The catcher does play D, call pitches and try to make the pitcher feel confident and be successful.
  8. We thrive against the best and struggle vs the no-names.
  9. One could also end up in LF. Keep 'em both, at least until there is a clear logjam.
  10. Continuity of what? You wanna repeat 2021's pitching and defense results, next year?
  11. It's you that won't listen. It's about proportionality. If one catcher catches better pitchers more often than the others, some exclusively with just one, the numbers are apples vs oranges. Of the 9 pitchers with 50+ PAs with both catchers, 5 were RP'ers and 4 SP'ers. (ERod is only caught br Vaz.) Yes, Vaz does slightly better with the pitchers with smaller sample sizes than 50, but it's still Plawecki 10-7 with the top 17 pitchers with 20+ PAs with both catchers. By itself, this is not earth-shattering, but when every season reveals the same thing, those ignoring it are the ones "not listening." It's not like Plawecki is some boy wonder. Leon blew Vaz away. It's more about Vaz's short-comings than anything special by Plawecki. That's why I'm fine with replacing Plawecki (and Vaz, too). Defense starts at catcher and SS.
  12. Here are the updated BTV values for our best players: 77 Devers 54 Casas 42 Houck 41 Verdugo 34 Mayer 32 Bogey 23 Duran 19 Eovaldi & Yorke 12 Downs & Taylor 11 Kike & Jimenez 9 Pivetta 6 Mata 5 Dalbec, Bello, Renfroe, Whitlock, Jordan 4 Groome, Barnes, Arroyo 3.5 Seabold, Winckowski 3 McDonough, R Hern, Rosario 2.5 Bonaci, Lugo, Ward, Bleis, Potts, Valdez, Wong, Decker 2 Murphy Note: only 7 players between 6 and 23 and 9 between 5 and 34. I'd put Whitlock near Houck, Dalbec near Pivetta and Mayer way higher. Overrated? Perhaps Duran and Rosario- maybe Downs, who slipped from over 20 to 12.
  13. True, but maybe part of the reason BOS and BAL allow so many runs is because they face the rays and Jays almost 25% of their games. The stat that does it for me is the BAbip. If ours was at .300, our pitching would look great.
  14. I'd add Downs & Duran to that list and would guess one of the 4 is traded this winter or at the deadline in 2022. I'm not projecting an emptying of the farm, but a strategic deal here or there seems likely.
  15. The ERA can be misleading, too. ERA last 14 starts 3.46 Stroman 3.88 ERod
  16. Agreed. Talk to Bogey, this winter. If he's looking for Lindor money, consider trading him before all we get is a comp pick.
  17. I'm not a big Plawecki fan. I think he gets more from the pitchers than Vaz, but there are other catchers that can do that or even better. I do value pitch framing and blocking bad pitches, but if robo umps come about, that won't be a factor. I have liked Vaz, but have felt his offense outweighs his poor staff handling, but this year, yikes! If it were up to me, I might trade Vaz and non tender Plawecki. Sign a guy known for his defense and handling a staff and go with Wong/Hernandez as the back-up. (maybe sign a cheap vet)
  18. Well, he's still .974 in Sept (14 PAs). Also, Marwin only has 47 PAs since July 11th.
  19. If the BTV site has any value, they currently have JD at -4.4 value. Since he makes $19.3M, next year, I guess they place his value at about $15M/1. Would anyone here trade JD +$4M for a distant prospect with little hope? Would anyone trade him +$8M for a decent pitcher with $4M value (like a pitcher similar to Seabold or Groome)? Another idea might be to trade him for a high-priced pitcher worth about $4M less than his salary. This could be done with the idea of signing Schwarber using some of the savings.
  20. Santana is giving us an MVP stretch that is better than Marwin's 22 PAs with HOU. Last 23 PAs: .948 OPS 1 2B 2 HRs 4 RBI 3 BB
  21. Nobody said it was fun, but 4 rings sure was! We've actually had the 3 worst and 4 of our worst 8 seasons in the last 9 years (2012-2020). We also had 2 rings in those 9 years. I'll take this 9 year stretch vs any other stretch not covering 2004-2007.
  22. Maybe, but it's a 22 PA sample size that was at .676 before last night. He had these stretches with the Sox: .696 in 27 PAs in April. 1.020 in 22 PAs later in April. .878 in 25 PAs in May. 1.108 in 16 PAs in June .765 in 36 PAs at the end of June into July.
×
×
  • Create New...