Why not suggest what you think could be done?
You have $60M to spend and Bogey and Devers might cost $50-55M. How can any GM make us better by either keeping one or both or my keeping neither.
IMO, the only way is for... (probably 2 or more are needed)
1. JH to increase spending
2. Trade some or most of the top prospects
3. Count on prospects to fill key role and they come through
4. Expect the GM to find 6+ Schreibers and Refsnyders this winter
IMO, the team has chosen #3 and #4 and may do #1 sporadically, when they feel we are close enough to be just 1-2 key players from a great chance at a ring. Again, it's just my opinion.
I have suggested some plans that might work, like maybe trading Casas for a solid SP'er and then signing a cheap 1B/DH on a 1 year deal. I've suggested maybe paying less for Swanson or K Wong, instead of Bogey, so we can spend more on filling other wide open slots.
Again, where am even hinting at us not getting worse, if we let Bogey and or Devers go? I've NEVER said anything close to that.
My point is, AGAIN, bringing them back may just barely keep us even for a few years, but their cost will either force JH to spend more than he has shown he is willing to do, as in staying over the tax line for 3 or more years, or we will not be able to back-fill high need areas with expensive FAs.
Other options are to get help from the farm, which has produced Houck, Crawford, Duran, Dalbec and worse for over 5 years or to trade much or the farm, like DD did, and end up where we are no, 4-5 years from now.
What's your plan?
I missed another option, I'd gladly hear it.