A lot of good discussion, far more than I expected. So, thanks, everyone.
About the Pirates. MLB is a big business, and the Pirates, however much their ownership may fail to even try to field to a contender, fulfill a vital function. They are one of 30 MLB teams and one of the oldest, going back to the 19th century. Even in last place seasons, they win roughly 4 of 10 games, so not even teams headed for 100 wins (and thereby win 6 of 10 games) can be sure of a sweep in a 3 or 4 game series. Thus, as a small market club (in the 68th largest city in the USA), do they get the residue of the luxury tax paid by the teams which can afford or simply prefer to spend large to get the best players money can buy.
Speaking of spending large, I see the Phillies, now headed by Dave Dombrowski, have the 4th biggest payroll at $234M. I never liked Dombrowski, but don't remember griping too much about his spendthrift ways when the Sox ran away with the 2018 season and WS.
In between the Pirates and the Phillies (and Yankees and Mets and Dodgers), is Chaim Bloom, who comes from a highly successful small market club (the intrepid Rays) and is now working for John Henry, who has supported big spending, but with some limits some times. I therefore love the discussion on another thread about Bloom's extension of Whitlock because several of you have pointed out that's the way Bloom prefers to acquire/keep players.
I don't share George Will's politics, but I like his writing and believe he does truly love baseball. Plus I too have railed against robo-ump, against the dramatic and effective repositioning of fielders for each batter based on computer analysis, and against the unending kabuki movements of pitchers and hitters.