I completely agree they play and we watch one game at a time, and every game has a story of its own.
But it's mindless not to see each game in the context of the season. Specifically, there are pretty big differences between being 10 games below .500, exactly at .500 and 10 games above .500 midway thru the season.
In the last 12 games the Sox took 2/3 from Yankees, who have the best won-lost record in the AL, 2/3 from the Phillies, who have the best won-lost record in MLB, 3/3 from the Jays, who used to be ahead of the Sox in the AL wild card race, and 2/3 from the Reds, who are still just 2.5 games out of a wild card slot in the NL.
It is not projecting to be hopeful instead of pessimistic. I think your obvious pessimism is because these Sox are, except for Devers and Jansen, pretty much a bunch of no-names. For at least 17 seasons and 4 WS wins John Henry espoused big payrolls and big names, but no longer.
Instead this year the combined salaries of all 6 starters--Houck, Crawford, Pivetta, Bello, Whitlock, and Criswell so far--are less than the $16M Jansen is getting and less than the $17M the Sox are paying Sale to pitch for Atlanta. But those no-names are why the Sox ERA is ranked 5th, which is the best it's been in a very long time. And no-name Houck has the lowest ERA, 2.14, among AL starters and 12 quality starts out of 15 total.
And the rest of the no-name Sox lineup--Duran, Rafaela, Wong, O'Neill, Abreu, Hamilton, Refsnyder, Gonzalez, and Smith--are getting paid less than 1/2 of what Devers is paid. And now just maybe that cheap charlie lineup, appalling as it is to real Sox fans, is starting to hit with some consistency.