FredLynn
-
Posts
11,851 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by FredLynn
-
IMO that counts since he had a direct hand in the results. From what I understand, Theo is not involved in negotiating the compensation the Sox will get when he leaves. The draft picks that have already been made during his tenure he should get partial credit for, shared with his scouts.
-
We should have made the playoffs once it was Sept 3. But we were going nowhere once we got into the playoffs because we had no pitching. We finished NINTH in overall ERA in the AL. Frankly, I am glad it turned out this way with the Rays in instead of us. If we made the playoffs none of this would have happened and we would have been at least one more year away from a ring.
-
I started a thread in the "Off Topic" area so that we don't come here and inadvertently behave badly by these rules. The forums are different. No politics here, I see. People have been banned for discussing politics; and no political threads. Here profanity seems tolerated; on Sawxheads it was an issue with this year's moderator. Last year's moderator didn't care, but he was an a-hole
-
This comment on Crawford was, at best, ill advised. I will give Henry credit: at least he opened up and tried to answer some of the accusations being leveled at the team by the media: This Friday, he was on Felger and Mazz exchanging verbal blows, ripping apart whoever revealed the personal stuff about Terry Francona and ruining whatever motivation beyond payday Carl Crawford will ever have in Boston. His line about not supporting the Crawford signing will have some major repercussions. Crawford will be playing in Boston with whatever is left of a $142 million chip on his shoulder for the next six years.
-
Here is a link to the audio of a part of Henry's interview. Its long, and he sounds half asleep. I don't know whether to believe him or not. Some of what he says sounds fishy. http://www.boston.com/sports/blogs/thebuzz/2011/10/audio_john_henr.html
-
From Sawxheads. Right now I think there are about a half dozen of us here: IPOT, ELKTONNIC, BRENNAN, FRED, MUGGAH, and me. More are on the way. That forum was never as large as this one. A significant portion of like-minded individuals who really could see little wrong with the club got tired of the debate and formed their own forum which will have "very strict rules" according to the person running it. To me, that means censorship. I prefer an exchange of viewpoints, so I am here. Appreciate the welcome.
-
From what I can see, its a respectful eclectic group. Good discussions; little rancor. You need both sides represented to have an interesting discussion Fred. How incredibly boring it would be for everyone to agree on everything. Thats what will happen on the new board. More power to them. Since you are not a Dodger fan I don't think that will be an issue here, hopefully. Unless the King tosses me off, I will probably be here most of the time.
-
So you are saying that his role in scouting young talent is equal to his role in scouting free agents? You know that is not true. He negotiates with the agents of the FA personally; he signs off on the draft picks. Totally different level of involvement. I will give you a point on his trades; most have worked out well.
-
Welcome aboard Fred! Glad you could make it. Hope the beach treated you well.
-
-
Edes is not of this world.
-
He has nothing to do with the identity of that prospect. He is not making a choice. I say we leave that person or persons out. Furthermore, he is only moderately involved in the selection of who we draft, or have drafted, while he was here. I will give him credit for choosing a good evaluation team, but not for the choices themselves.
-
When Orwell gets here he can debate WAR and those kind of metrics with those here who think that they are extremely useful numbers. Orwell is a mathmatician.
-
I agree 100%. I was never a Terry Francona fan, but he did not deserve all this. He is entitled to some sort of private life. I really don't care to know about his medical conditions, what meds he is taking (after all, was it just Advil that he was taking for pain-that has zero effect on your judgement), and how his marriage is going. Furthermore, today Henry slammed Crawford saying that he did not support signing him. How is that supposed to motivate Crawford to do well next year, knowing that the owner never liked his game? Some of these guys just don't know when to keep their mouths shut, and others don't know when to open them.
-
-
-
What grade would you give him for FA acquisitions and budget management? I would give him a D at best, maybe even an F. So even if he gets a B or an A with regard to trades he engineered and his staff gets an A for drafting good players (as someone here mentioned, he doesn't do that himself), it still averages out to mediocrity. If all we graded him on was his FA record, he would have failed school.
-
-
Well, Foulke worked out, right?
-
I do not agree with his premise, and I do research when I see fit to do it. I do not know how it would come out since it hasn't been done. Furthermore, in the process of a debate EVERYONE uses numbers and data that support their own position.
-
I am no fan of Slappy, but he has done well with the Yankees. He has given them some numbers. During his 8 years his OPS is .941 and he has averaged over 35 HR a year. Same for Mark Teixeira, though not quite as much. His OPS in three years as a Yankee is .877. Both have been productive. We get Crawford (OPS with the Sox: .694) and Cameron (OPS: .637) and Drew who never even reached 70 RBIs in his five year Sox career and wouldn't play if he had a hangnail. The point is that there are many many FAs who worked out for their team. Even Epstein got a few of them; just not enough. His ratio of failures to successes is atrocious. He did well in other areas, but failed miserably in getting his money's worth out of FAs. Thats really not even debatable IMO. Its all over the media. And that shortcoming significantly affects his overall grade as our GM. He WASTED way too much of the franchise's resources in signing lemons, lemons that we will be stuck with for years after he leaves.
-
-
You are sure I will do it? LOL. No, I am not going to do it. Sorry. If you want it done you will have to do it. Here is what I am saying: Epstein is a poor judge of FA talent and executed far more busts than finds during his tenure here, and that that affects his overall grade in terms of his performance. I am not making a negative judgement about his trades or his minor league acquisitions via drafting. Lets give him an "A" for the latter categories, for the sake of the debate. How would you grade his FA acquisitions and how would that affect his overall grade as GM? You already know what I think about this. It has a profound affect on his grade.
-
Not that I know of. Unless he was there under a different name.
-
Fixed.