Funny that one of the few negatives today was a V negative. If we had lost this game we could very well have chalked this one up to V not having Repko taking on that 3-1 count with the bases loaded.
I have no idea why he left it in Repko's hands when he could have just given him the take sign. As it was he swung at ball 4, which would have put him on first, driven in the run and left the Sox with only 1 out in that inning. Every possible factor that you could think of pointed to having Repko take there so it is not like it was a 50-50 sort of thing. At least I don't think so.
Worked out that we win this game but I would love to know why V did not have Repko take in that spot just to know how V arrived at that decision in that spot.
As I said at the time, if V was not going to give him the take sign there, when is he ever going to give a guy the take sign and under what circumstances?
We are fond of counting the loses per season purported to be chalked up to Tito. If we lost this one that way, V would have gotten the credit for this one.