Absolutely.....
Kiermaier irritates me no end because while he is a great CF, he makes so many plays look so much more difficult than they in fact are and gets to pull it off playing in a town that really does not know any better. Pillar does not do that though he might be just a hair under Kiermaier. JBJ just glides to the baseball. So much of what JBJ accomplishes in CF is lost on the viewing public because he positions himself better than the other league CFers and he takes very direct routes to the baseball. In all honesty, I can't tell much difference defensively between Kiermaier, Pillar and JBJ because all three of them do it very differently to achieve pretty much the same result. All around, JBJ might be better than the other two. He comes in on the ball better than Kiermaier but not as good as Pillar. Pillar comes in better than Kiermaier but does not go back as good as Kiermaier. The terribly inadequate stats and advanced defensive stats they have devised so far favor both Kiermaier and Pillar more than they do JBJ. In Fenway, I would take JBJ over the other two. In your average ML park, probably Kiermaier followed by Pillar followed by JBJ. The three of them are so close together that its a sheet of paper dif between them. Jones is no slouch either and is probably even less than a sheet of paper under those three guys.