iortiz
-
Posts
17,512 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by iortiz
-
In no way, dude.
-
He is saying that the Nats is a big market team... wait... are you changing your position?
-
Carlos Slim's soccer and baseball teams have as much value as NYY or BOS since his regional network and telco revenues are not accounted ? Dude, do you even listen what you are talking about? You should read your economics book instead playing video games, no offense.
-
-
-
-
-
The Washington Nationals. They are a big market team, just as NYY.
-
Classic. Can't you see? A 16 Forbes team is a big market team these days. BTW suddenly he is interested. Mass of contradictions. Be prepare for going in circles.
-
Then, do not bother in reply.
-
Read the thread.
-
-
That's the funny thing
-
this is exactly how confusion starts...
-
Yes, bravo! A700's perspective is accurate. We are making progress though. You, A700 and me are agreeing that they are not a Big Market team. No way. On the other hand, If you want to split the market saying that KC/Pitt/SD are small market teams and NY and BOS are Big market teams and the rest mid-market team, fine, we can agree on that and move on but I have to tell you that they are still closer to the small market teams than the big market teams. A700 already put another perspective which is fair to me. You are battling in the dark side of the moon with me and A700. I wonder, are you going to battle in the other side of the moon with those who still saying that the Washington Nationals are a big market team? or this is just against A700 and me? BTW check out how the discussion started. I said that the Nats are small market team. Then MVP said that DC is a big market place (Those concepts are different). The rest is history.
-
Bravo, Maestro. As always you put my ideas in better words and perspective.
-
Let me play devil's advocate. Will top three stay healthy 190 IP+? Will they post atleast their career numbers?. Are Bard/Aceves the solution? If you give me 3 yes, this team is a WS caliber.
-
According with bleacher report TB has the best rotation in the majors. TB, NYY, TEX, and LAA are above us in this department. We need a SP so badly. 1. TB 2. Philli 3. SF Giants 4. LAA 5. Braves 6. NYY 7. Texas 8. STL 9. Nats 10. Bos. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...ations/page/22
-
Well, I already rest my case. If you think that the Washington Nationals are a big market team, you are seriously confused. And again, if you can't realize the importance and impact from a world wide/global approach (beyond the business including baseball), sorry but your business acumen is poor. As simple as that.
-
Twisting the things, as usual. I should take Meh's advise. You take things out of context.
-
I'm going to give you a clue. Lets use this thermomether. How many times are the Nats' games transmitted in national TV? You are getting heat, your heat doesn't allow you read properly. I never disputed if DC was a small/big market place. I've said that dozen of times. We are disputing whether the Nats is a big market team or not. That is totally different. I already put several examples of other proffesional sport teams which play in big market places (Clippers, Atletico de Madrid) and are not big market teams. if you can't see that, I really do not know how to make it clearer to you. Now, you are discrediting my source because you do not have arguments. Bring another definition and source of big/small market team and probably we can enrich the discussion.
-
This is not a language barrier/issue at all. Discuss with UN? And MVP. They are who are saying that the Nats are a big market team, not me. Or what? Don't you like debate with them?
-
Nope. It is from wiki, actually. You are not reading. Clearly, The post starts saying , according with wiki.... Again, you are rating the size of a market place/territory. We are talking about the size of a market team. As the definition says, it is related with media market coverage. Hence I asked what is the Nats' media market coverage in the US? Do you realize that fanbase/popularity is related with media market? Nats' popularity, even in their own town is questionable. Read the article that I already posted. Nats games are not attractive. Buying advertising in Nats' games is not attractive and/or cheap compared with Big Market teams. Again, Nats are not a big market team.
-
say that to UN?, no me. They said that the Nats are a big market team. I said that they are not. If they were a big market team they should be similar to NY or slightly above/below them, shouldn't they? Read the thread. I didn't started the polemic. I'm right. The Nats are not a big market team.
-
Means everything in order to rate the size of a market team. I already posted the definition. Read it.
