Someone (was it here?) said that in a 3 and half hour game, there's 18 minutes of actual action. I think it would be difficult to cut down game times without severely changing the game. Years ago some solutions were floated, including making it 2 strikes instead of 3 which would be awful. I like that there's no game clock, I like that each game has its own rhythm. But do I want to spend almost 4 hours watching one? Do I want to start watching a playoff game on the East Coast at 8pm knowing it will go beyond midnight and I have work the next day?
Getting youngsters involved and interested is paramount. They NEED to make the Saturday WS game an afternoon one. It will not kill them. Just take a step back, stop thinking of money and think of growing the game. How do you get more kids playing it, versus basketball or football? (I guess football is dwindling now because of head injuries). How do you get black kids to take up baseball when the number of black players has been dwindling for years?
Since a significant number of people are giving up cable, they should be offering mlb tv without blackouts. Even if you have to pay more and use the cable channel's website if you live in market, I would do that. But I have given up on mlb tv for another reason, which is the technical drawbacks of DSL that make the picture freeze so often. A huge number of people complained about this. That touches on another unrelated issue, the poor quality of the U.S.'s broadband service compared to other countries.