Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Spudboy

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    24,487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Spudboy

  1. Yeah his sarcasm would be "funny" if it were not directed solely at Thunder. Thunder can say some strange things but so f***ing what? Why does anyone here feel the need to demonstrate that their prick is bigger than anyone else's? We all make fun of someone now and then and I'm okay with that. But singling out one person, and in this case a very young person, is immature and wrong.
  2. ? Are you guys talking about the band Love? I have no idea.
  3. Neither exists. But the Scituate Sea Monstah did!
  4. Boom.
  5. I am not an Endocrinologist but I would expect adrenaline to enhance and accelerate all body functions. I bet Dr. Jacko could enlighten us with facts.
  6. Yes it does seem that way. Of course with no supporting stats I must be wrong.
  7. Why do you pick on this kid? You do it with obvious regularity. It's stupid and unseemly of you to do so.
  8. Well the odd thing is that Vaz's foot left a contrail of dirt on the plate which coincides exactly with the path of his foot. Indeed, the dirt is clumped together near the leading edge of the plate, near the black, and then diffuseness as it get closer to the center of the plate. Again, I can see the ump making the wrong call in real time because he would have to be able to focus on Vaz's foot while focusing on the tag at the same time. But the idiots in New York had several minutes to review all video angles and got it wrong. There was, in my opinion, irrefutable evidence that Vaz touched the plate and that he touched the plate before the tag. Oh well. It's milk over the dam now.
  9. But now you will see Jacoby Brissett. That kid has some skills.
  10. This is what we should all want.
  11. Maybe not. How did you feel about the Sox backing their way into the post season last year? Were you brimming with confidence?
  12. It is disruptive runners that are of no value. Supposedly.
  13. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!1!!! All without committing any bonehead moves, either!
  14. Excellent f***ing post. Talksox members have a selective memory.
  15. I think he has been a f***ing bust. Yankees should have put him under the knife two years ago. If he pitches really well against the Sox I am surprised.
  16. That's what lack of education and willful ignorance can do. Make America Great Again! We should drop the political stuff before a shitstorm.
  17. Vasquez was clearly safe. I have no idea how the NY crew saw anything else unless they did not get the right field feed and that is very unlikely. I can understand the ump making the wrong cal, but with slo-mo and replays galore upholding that call is a huge mistake. Not that it seemed to matter. The Sox had only 5 hits.
  18. I though he did okay.
  19. I like your idea.
  20. Money and availability would be my guess.
  21. I still think "the cliff" is a steaming load of s***.
  22. Yup.
  23. I like what I see but I am not blind to the fact that the kid needs to work on his footwork and throws to 1st. Unless Macholo is signed I say leave him at 3rd and watch him get better.
  24. Maybe because he has seen a bunch of wild throws and errors in a short period of time?
×
×
  • Create New...