In my opinion, I think Coco has a better frontcourt and Flynnatic has a better backcourt.
Andrew Bynum >> Brook Lopez (since injuries don't count, otherwise I'd take Lopez since he's on the court)
Kevin Love >>> Joakim Noah
Kevin Durant >> Ron Artest (although Ron Artest is underrated defensively, but Durant is one of the best players in the NBA, imagine what he will be in 3 years)
but
Monta Ellis
and Rodney Stuckey
So I think that Coco has a better starting 5, but one of the 2 positions that Flynnatic is superior in is one of the more important positions in the game. Note how the Heat are a game or two above .500 with LeBron, Wade, and Bosh but without a point guard.
The benches are pretty good as well, but I like the potential of Coco's bench more. I think that Flynnatic's bench is more balanced and a lot in the way of shooters, but I think that Martin, Deng, and Beasley have the potential to be dominant bench players. I think that George Hill is underrated (as a Spurs fan) and I think that Flynnatic dominates the point position. I think that Flynnatic has a small victory in the SG position, but I'm basing that on Gordon's potential with Crawford and that Ellis is inconsistent and plays a different style of game from Stuckey.
That said, I think that Coco sweeps the SF, PF, and C spots, assuming that Bynum stays healthy. Since injuries aren't a factor here, I can't deduct from Coco for Bynum (like I can't deduct from ytrb for Yao Ming) so the edge goes to Coco there.
Originally, I would have said that Coco had the better team hands down, but now that I look at it, it's closer than I originally thought. I think that Coco still wins, but it really does deserve to be an 8 vs. 9 matchup, rather than the 9 vs. 4 matchup I thought it would be.