Oh, brother.
No one has sustained success with 2 strikes.
Again, because you keep missing the point. (And made me read an 11-paragrah post again).
Sucking with 2-strikes is not 100 % related to struggling.
Take, for instance, Mike Lowell's "lost" 2005 season.
He hit:
.133 in 0-2 counts, the NL average was .155.
.234 in 1-2 counts, the NL average was .188.
.188 in 2-2 counts, the NL average was .222.
.258 in 3-2 counts, the NL average was .244
Mike Lowell SUCKED througout ALL of 2005, so please explain to me how every time a hitter is struggling it's ALWAYS because he's hitting way below the norm on 2-strike situations.
As you can see the example, that is not always the case, because nothing in baseball is absolute, or black and white, there are always exceptions to the rule, and that's why i brought up BABIP, because, in Lowell's case, he hit in the low .220's when ahead in the count, in Ortiz' case, he was way below average in every instance where he had 2 strikes, but that was due more to lack of contact than anything else, but implying that every struggling hitter in the majors is struggling to be league average while hitting with 2 strikes is an absolute you have no chance of proving.