Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Dipre

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Dipre

  1. Lol where'd ya pull that from? So, by your logic, he would have let Alex Gonzales hit with the game on the line if it got to him? Lol ok. Hell, he might've let 'Tek hit, who hits reasonably well against lefties, defeating the basis of your argument.
  2. Usually, yes. But is that so bad?
  3. I'm still not sold on the Angels deal, basically because of the fact that there were a TON of over-achievers on that team that never got exposed. However, given the recent appearance of such statistical data, defeat must be admitted.
  4. I said "As a stand alone stat". That should be interpreted as "A fantastic stat, but by itself, doesn't tell the whole story". Stop cherry picking.
  5. I don't think any of us has taken it that far. However, as stated earlier, the amount of variables in a short series makes predicting a winner extremely difficult. Sometimes a team that is head and shoulders better meets a lesser team with enormous momentum and better health, and then strange s*** happens. That's about the size of it.
  6. You have to prove me wrong for me to admit it. That's the beauty of it.
  7. Ah. Saw that coming from a mile away. Still made me chuckle.
  8. *Sigh* It's not about being right, my good sir. It's about discussion. If you don't like discussion (very civil discussion btw) then this isn't the place for you.
  9. I hate to admit it, but yes. That's not even debatable.
  10. Exactly the point of the argument in the first place? We were talking about the postseason being a "crapshoot" because the best team doesn't always win because of all the variables involved. And............two minutes later there come the vultures with fantastic opinions that do not pertain the root of the argument. Well done.
  11. Not arguing it isn't, but were the 2002 Angels really the best team in the playoffs?
  12. The thing is RSR, that you need to remember the fact that they had a really really really good bullpen, and a couple of overachievers in the rotation. Remember Ramon Ortiz?
  13. Run differential, by itself, is not a given indicator of dominance. Just sayin'.
  14. Ah, Dipre and Jacko agreement. Cherish the day.
  15. Lol read that again. Slowly.
  16. So.......Bucholz huh?
  17. Specially Weaver who's the definition of DOMINANT.
  18. Too many variables are involved in a short series for believing the term "crapshoot" is inappropriate. That's the whole point of the term.
×
×
  • Create New...