Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Jacoby_Ellsbury

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,063

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jacoby_Ellsbury

  1. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  2. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    He won't. He's had a single un-terrible season at the plate, and that was last year. He's 34 years old. He's a complete bust waiting to happen and will only serve as the latest installment to our circus of mediocrity at shortstop.
  3. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  4. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    We gave up a first in the Lugo signing, right? If so, this is definitely the worst signing since then. If not, I don't even know.
  5. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Jesus titty-f***ing christ I'm going to run into a chainsaw.
  6. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Sign Beltre to complement it (for defensive purposes, obviously), and that's one f*** of a left side of the infield. I agree with Dipre that SAFECO killed Beltre and putting him in Fenway could spike his numbers.
  7. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    I love how ESPN has come to a total standstill over this. Its understandable when it first happens, but he's been released from the hospital, he appears to be okay, the police say drugs aren't involved, yet they carry on.
  8. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    NO
  9. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  10. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  11. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  12. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Vaseline?
  13. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Stats are propaganda. Mmmmmmkay.
  14. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  15. Jacoby_Ellsbury
  16. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Me. Not buying a new one though.
  17. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    It's been replaced by common sense.
  18. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    An .861 OPS is an .861 OPS. On what planet does this become more or less valuable depending on the player's fielding position?
  19. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    The potential reward is enormous. I might favor bringing him in if he was on a deal where he could be easily discarded if he started acting up. We're not a young team that will be scarred for the season if Iverson was signed, turned out to be a cancer, and was canned.
  20. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    My marketing teacher claims to have some inside info and thinks the Celtics will look long and hard at Iverson. I don't think bringing him on board would be a catastrophe or anything - maybe the chance to be on a leading title contender will set him straight - but I don't like the odds. What a bench if it happens and works out well, though.
  21. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Nope. A good OPS is a good OPS, a good SLG is a good SLG, etc.
  22. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    I think he should catch. Positional offensive value as a whole annoys me. I look at offense, I look at the batting order, not the field.
  23. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Who cares? An .861 OPS is an .861 OPS. This positional offensive value stuff is garbage.
  24. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    Wait, what the f***?
  25. Jacoby_Ellsbury
    1) Very few of their players have contracts running past this season. 2) If they added James to today's team and did nothing else, they'd be a 45 win team. And I have a feeling that the Knicks wouldn't leave it at that.
×
×
  • Create New...