A post by someone else sparked me to this thought.
A while back when I was watching a game. Don't know if it was the Red Sox or not. But the announcers were discussing the idea of those who have played in Japanese professional leagues and teams, that then come over to the U.S. should not be eligable for Rookie of the Year, since technically they aren't rookies to pro-baseball. But however, others claim since it's their first season in the MLB, they are capable of the RoY award.
And of course the same goes to any American player from the MLB who transfers to the Japanese leagues. And I'm sure the same goes for every other nationality.
I know, or atleast I'm pretty sure, as of right now, the Japanese players are capable of winning the award.
But what do you think about this? Should first time MLB players who have played in other pro-leagues in another country be eligable for the Rookie of the Year Award?
My opinion is yes. Even though (focusing on U.S. and Japan here) Japanese players are familiar with basic baseball and professional leagues, they haven't faced U.S. players and have never been in the MLB, so it's a whole new ballgame to them.
A good example is Daisuke Matsuzaka, an excellent pitcher in Japan, he comes here, and he's not so bad, but not all the hype he was made up to be. He had to get use to the American batters, and all of their strategies. So because of that, I think Japanese players, or any nationality from any other pro league, should be allowed to recieve the award.