I get that. But I dont get why sox fans as well as the FO feel that they need to be paying less than or right at value. You can afford to overpay when that need is absolutely essential to team success. I agree with you that flexibility is important. But flexibility in terms of years and not AAV. If the sox agreed that Beltre for 3 yrs is a good option, then why not overpay in terms of AAV to get the player for the term you want? The funny thing is, the sox seem to be contradicting themselves on a daily basis. They go out and sign JD Drew for a 5 yr deal, when it would have been absolutely better for the franchise to go 4 or less at a higher AAV. Then they are unwilling to go to 4 yrs for Jason Bay, a guy who in Boston would have given them the middle of the order bat that they needed. Then, they go out and sign a guy like Cameron for 2 yrs, when he wasnt going to get the yrs or the AAV from anyone else on the open market. The sox arent losing money, they are making money hand over fist. If the goal is to maintain roster flexibility and financial flexibility, then they should be willing to pay more to secure fewer yrs. They seem to do that with certain guys, then go past that on others. It's interesting