Your opinion matters very little when you know nothing about the player in question.
Barnes is 2 yrs older, was a college pitcher, and is at the same level. He is dominating the level more than Campos is, that is for sure, but he is also 2 yrs older. In 2 yrs, Campos will likely be in AAA should he not be injured. You could definitely make the case for Barnes to be higher than Campos due to velocity, which Barnes does have. But you cannot make it based on stuff, especially when you factor in another 2 yrs of growth and the control of the breaking ball and change that Campos has shown. I want you to look at Campos' numbers in short season last yr just for comparison. They are ridiculous
Swihart was ranked based upon his draft status. Thus far, he's shown nothing at the same level Campos is dominating, and he is also 3 months older than Campos. So it's not an age thing. I think Campos ends up higher than him come season's end. I do think, eventually, Swihart gets it, but he's had an inauspicious start to his pro career
Kalish isnt a prospect, A. He's already used up his rookie status. B, he missed 2011 and is not due to play in 2012 until around the ASB. How can you make any conclusions on him when he hasnt played?
Middlebrooks and Bogaerts will be above him in the top 100, that is for sure. I dont doubt that one at all. Middlebrooks is playing like a top 50 prospect, maybe even top 25.