That was unnecessary. I am of the opinion that when you put together a winner you keep the core together and do your maintenance on the periphery. You ride it out with the core for at least one or two years to see if they have another championship run or two in them. If you are going to replace parts of the core, you make sure that you upgrade at those positions. The Sox let Pedro and Lowe go and they didn't replace them with upgrades, and they let the pitching slip by trying to get by with low-cost high-risk choices like Matt Mantei and Wade Miller. This year they are going to take the field with a big downgrade in CF. If they were prepared to let him go, they should have had a contingency plan, which they clearly don't.
When you have an all-time great like Pedro, you keep him. You don't make a foolish bet on whether he has 2, 3 or 4 years left in his arm. Even if he only has two good years left, how are you going to replace an all-time great for those two years. The moves since 2004 were an unneccessary dismantling of that team. You can contrast their actions with the actions of the White Sox front office that moved quickly to keep Konerko (who is overpaid) and Garland and they built on their weaknesses by bringing in Thome (with a high price tag and near the end of his career) and Vasquez. They were willing to sacrifice Rowand-- a good cheap, young player, but in his best hitting days he would be a mediocre compared to a stud hitter like Thome. The White Sox are doing it the right way if they want to repeat. Maybe the Red Sox made the smart business choices for their bottom line, but I don't care about their bottom line. I am a fan. I like to see the best team they can put out on the field. I am not their GM or Controller ( and neither are you), so I don't care about their financial statement.