Everything I posted is a fact. There is no question of "truth." I said that the ump made a bad call that cost the Pirates the game, and I stand by that statement. The call was clearly wrong, and unusually bad for a play at first base. I never siad that I knew that the ump's call was the result of influence.
Let me ask you this. Do you believe politicians who state that they are not influenced by lobbyist money when they pass legislation? None of us do, but we don't know for sure. Certainly, there is an appearance of impropriety and a suspicion of influence with regard to Randazzo.
BTW: I shared the story only because of 26 to 6's sarcastic post that the umps were paid by the Yankees. I poted my story precisely because none of us can rule out that there is something going on... and like contributions by lobbyists, it might be completely legal, but it does buy influence.