Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. I hate when my fellow Sox fans whine about Yankee money like the Sox are a small market team. They have plenty of resources. The problem is they have squandered hundreds of millions of dollars on suck ass players.
  2. Kalish has had 2 lost seasons. It's probably time to pull the plug on him.
  3. Gammons is in the Hall of Fame. He's not getting fired.
  4. Congrats to Big Papi CC! How many times have you won the TalkSox league?
  5. I think he's shot. He doesn't have upper 90's stuff anymore, and he has no clue where he is throwing the ball.
  6. ^ and that will be the staff of a 4th place team.
  7. Yes, they are faced with more work than they have had in the past. We will find out if they are up to it. The jury is out.
  8. No I have not argued the former at all. And yes I disagree that we have a solid core of players to work with. The core that we have in house (except for WMB ) has produced a truly horrible record since the end of August 2011. The current core is also aging at key spots (Ortiz) and under performing to the point of great concern at other spots (Ellsbury and Lester).
  9. If I knew what point you were trying to make, I'd respond.
  10. If the strength of your team is your middle relief, your team sucks. This is a truism of baseball IMO.
  11. Seriously, 11th in Reliever ERA and last in Late and Close situations is not solid at all.
  12. I could live with him as a 4th OFer, but he has no pop at all. Outfielders have to have some pop.
  13. 11th in the league in starter's ERA, 11th in Reliever's ERA and the worst Late and Close bullpen --yeah great job. A healthy Bailey would have made all the difference in the world. He should get some votes for executive of the year.
  14. I agree with everything except a couple of items. Sweeney and Nava have no place on the 25 man roster of a winning team. They both stink.
  15. I completely agree with this. Selling off parts is not an indication of competence in evaluating talent or building a team. Thus far, Cherington has demonstrated very little aptitude in evaluating talent.
  16. I agree. I think Papelbon could have kept this ship of fools afloat only for a short period of time. However, in fixing the pitching they need to be fixing the rotation at the same time they are fixing the pen. I don't think they should fix the rotation with a wait and see attitude about the pen. Why bring in quality starters if you are not going to give them support at the end of games?
  17. I agree with you. This is an organization in disarray. There are a lot of holes. IMO opinion, they should fix the pitching first, because that will return the team to competitiveness more quickly. It is not a short term fix, because pitching should always be the foundation. They can attack the other holes incrementally as the opportunities present themselves. There should not be a wait and see attitude on the pitching. They need to aggressively rebuild the pitching. I have little confidence in the ability of this organization with regard to the evaluation of pitching.
  18. Is there a Pedro-like ace in this group? No, there isn't any sort of ace in that group. Lester is at best a #3. Does anyone in this group compare to Manny in his prime? We are a last place quality team right now. If these guys are the core, then we are in trouble. Maybe WMB turns out to be a total stud, but the rest just isn't very good for an elite team.
  19. No, I did not. Look back at the thread. MVP compared the 2001 squad inherited by the FO to the collection of garbage that we have now. That is not even a close comparison. They inherited a very talented roster, far more than the talent currently in the organization. No credit was taken from them for either 2004 or 2007. They have just never built a team from the ground up from a situation like exists today. We don't know how well they will do this. People get all bent out of shape when the truth is stated. We know that this FO can run a great team into the ground. We don't know if they can rebuild a team that is at the bottom of the heap. We will find out. This is a true statement. It pisses people off, but the FO has done a truly terrible job over the last 3+ years and 2012 is the culmination of lots of bad decisions. This didn't happen over night. This is not an aberration as some people viewed September 2011. This is a sick organization.
  20. Whether he is overpaid or not, they will have a very difficult time replacing his consistently excellent performance in that role. They spent money foolishly for years. There are lots of examples of this. When it came time for Papelbon, they decided that a closer wasn't worth the investment. They will be looking for his replacement for years and the end of games will be nightmares for several seasons. Right decision or wrong decision? $107 million on Dice K was clearly a bad decision. Lackey's contract was clearly a bad decision. We'll have to see how Papelbon finishes with the Phillies. He's off to a good start doing what he always did for us. As to the current state of affairs in our pen, people are making a terrible mistake if they think we have the arms inhouse to have a good pen next season. They need to add quality arms for the pen. i'd rather add one quality arm that might cost a few bucks rather than seeking value in lower cost options. Our FO has been a terrible at evaluating pitching talent.
  21. I disagree. I am not denying them credit for the 2007 team. I am just stating the obvious. This ownership has never been presented with the challenge of rebuilding a last place team that loses 90 games. GMs that take teams like that to the post season are candidates to win executive of the year. This challenge is much different than anything they have faced. The talent is very thin. Look at the roster. We stink. I don't know what 2007 has to do with this.
  22. Again, that was not built from the ground up. They had won in 2004, went to the playoffs in 2005, and averaged 94 wins over the prior 4 years, so they hardly built that team from the ground up. They have a challenge now unlike any they have had during their ownership tenure. They need to rebuild a team and organization that is in tatters. It's nothing like 2007.
×
×
  • Create New...